ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2019
Acceleration of spleen segmentation with end-to-end deep learning method and automated pipeline.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Splenic Volume and Surface Area According to Age and Gender: A Three-Dimensional Slicer Computed Tomography Study-Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improving spleen segmentation in ultrasound images using a hybrid deep learning framework.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- SVNC-Net: An optimized U-Net variant with 2D convolutions for lightweight 3D spleen segmentation.PloS one · 2025Article
- A Deep-Learning Approach to Spleen Volume Estimation in Patients with Gaucher Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Automated MRI Field of View Prescription from Region of Interest Prediction by Intra-Stack Attention Neural Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Current and emerging artificial intelligence applications for pediatric abdominal imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Evaluation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Spleen Segmentation in Patients with Conditions Directly or Indirectly Affecting the Spleen.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2021Article
- Validation and estimation of spleen volume via computer-assisted segmentation on clinically acquired CT scans.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Identifying Periampullary Regions in MRI Images Using Deep Learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Hematology: Current Challenges and Opportunities.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delineation of Computed Tomography (CT) abdominal anatomical structure, specifically spleen segmentation, is useful for not only measuring tissue volume and biomarkers but also for monitoring interventions. Recently, segmentation algorithms using deep learning have been widely used to reduce time humans spend to label CT data. However, the computerized segmentation has two major difficulties: managing intermediate results (e.g., resampled scans, 2D sliced image for deep learning), and setting up the system environments and packages for autonomous execution. To overcome these issues, we propose an automated pipeline for the abdominal spleen segmentation. This pipeline provides an end-to-end synthesized process that allows users to avoid installing any packages and to deal with the intermediate results locally. The pipeline has three major stages: pre-processing of input data, segmentation of spleen using deep learning, 3D reconstruction with the generated labels by matching the segmentation results with the original image dimensions, which can then be used later and for display or demonstration. Given the same volume scan, the approach described here takes about 50 s on average whereas the manual segmentation takes about 30 min on the average. Even if it includes all subsidiary processes such as preprocessing and necessary setups, the whole pipeline process requires on the average 20 min from beginning to end.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.