Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30798167›Full record

Trial reportNeuroImage. Clinical2019

Frontal brain activity and cognitive processing speed in multiple sclerosis: An exploration of EEG neurofeedback training.

Philipp M Keune, Sascha Hansen, Torsten Sauder, Sonja Jaruszowic, Christina Kehm, Jana Keune, Emily Weber, Michael Schönenberg, Patrick Oschmann

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philipp M KeuneDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany; Department of Physiological Psychology, University of Bamberg, Germany. Electronic address: pmkeune@gmail.com.
Sascha HansenDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany; Department of Physiological Psychology, University of Bamberg, Germany.
Torsten SauderDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany.
Sonja JaruszowicDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany; Department of Physiological Psychology, University of Bamberg, Germany.
Christina KehmDepartment of Physiological Psychology, University of Bamberg, Germany.
Jana KeuneDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany.
Emily WeberDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany.
Michael SchönenbergDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Patrick OschmannDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive deficits including impaired information processing speed as assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) are common in multiple sclerosis (MS). Oscillatory markers of processing speed may be extracted from magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) resting-state recordings. In this context, an increased proportion of frontal slow-wave (theta, 4-8 Hz) to fast-wave (beta, 13-30 Hz) EEG activity was indicative of impaired SDMT performance. Such an increased theta/beta ratio may reflect oscillatory slowing associated with deficits in attention control. Therapeutic approaches that consider atypical oscillatory activity in MS remain sparse.

objectivesIn a cross-sectional design, we examined the relation between SDMT performance, the EEG theta/beta ratio and its components. We also explored longitudinally, whether EEG neurofeedback could be used to induce a putatively adaptive alteration in these EEG parameters, toward a pattern indicative of improved processing speed.

methodsN = 58 MS patients (RRMS/SPMS/PPMS N: 18/35/3, 2 cases excluded) participated in a neuropsychological examination and a resting-state EEG recording. Subsequently, N = 10 patients received neurofeedback training for two weeks in a hospitalized setting. The purpose was to reduce the frontal theta/beta ratio through operant conditioning.

resultsIn the cross-sectional examination, patients with slow SDMT speed displayed an increased theta/beta ratio, relative to those with normal speed. This involved increased frontal theta power, whereas beta power was equal across groups. The theta/beta ratio remained stable during neurofeedback across sessions of the two-week training period. In an exploratory secondary analysis, within sessions a reduction in the theta/beta ratio during active training blocks relative pre/post session resting-states was observed, driven by reduced theta power.

conclusionsThese findings provide support for utilizing frontal EEG theta activity as an inverse marker of processing speed in MS. Across sessions, there was no support for successful operant conditioning of the theta/beta ratio during the two-week training period. The observed state-specific shift within sessions, involving a transient reduction in theta activity, nevertheless may provide a rationale for a further investigation of neurofeedback as a treatment approach in MS.

Indexed as

AdultCognitionCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesElectroencephalographyFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisNeurofeedbackAttentionElectroencephalogram (EEG)Multiple sclerosis (MS)NeurofeedbackSymbol digit modalities test (SDMT)

Identifiers

PMID30798167
PMCPMC6384325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.