Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30797561›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2019

Computational analysis of glenohumeral joint growth and morphology following a brachial plexus birth injury.

Nikhil N Dixit, Daniel C McFarland, Katherine R Saul

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Changes in Glenohumeral Musculoskeletal Development Following Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikhil N DixitDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Daniel C McFarlandDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Katherine R SaulDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States. Electronic address: ksaul@ncsu.edu.
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Tech-DevelopmentP2CHD065690 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2015 to 2019
$5.4M
Parallel Development of Bone and Muscle Impairments Following Neonatal Brachial Plexus InjuryR21HD088893 · NICHD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI COLE, JACQUELINE H, SAUL, KATHERINE · 2016 to 2017
$399k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065690NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD088893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children affected with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) undergo muscle paralysis. About 33% of affected children experience permanent osseous deformities of the glenohumeral joint. Recent evidence suggests that some cases experience restricted muscle longitudinal growth in addition to paralysis and reduced range of motion at the shoulder and elbow. It is unknown whether altered loading due to paralysis, muscle growth restriction and contracture, or static loading due to disuse is the primary driver of joint deformity after BPBI. This study uses a computational framework integrating finite element analysis and musculoskeletal modeling to examine the mechanical factors contributing to changes in bone growth and morphometry following BPBI. Simulations of 8 weeks of glenohumeral growth in a rat model of BPBI predicted that static loading of the joint is primarily responsible for joint deformation consistent with experimental measures of bone morphology, whereas dynamic loads resulted in normal bone growth. Under dynamic loading, glenoid version angle (GVA), glenoid inclination angle (GIA), and glenoid radius of curvature (GRC) (-1.3°, 38.2°, 2.5 mm respectively) were similar to the baseline values (-1.8°, -38°, 2.1 mm respectively). In the static case with unrestricted muscle growth, these measures increased in magnitude (5.2°, -48°, 3.5 mm respectively). More severe joint deformations were observed in GIA and GRC when muscle growth was restricted (GVA: 3.6°, GIA: -55°, GRC: 4.0 mm). Predicted morphology was consistent with literature reports of in vivo glenoid morphology following postganglionic BPBI. This growth model provides a framework for understanding the most influential mechanical factors driving glenohumeral deformity following BPBI.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBirth InjuriesBrachial PlexusChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePregnancyRange of Motion, ArticularRatsShoulder JointBone deformationBrachial plexus birth injuryContracturesFinite element analysisMusculoskeletal modeling

Identifiers

PMID30797561
PMCPMC6771017
OpenAlexW2912763872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.