Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30797381›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2019

Comparing satisfaction, alliance and intervention components in electronically delivered and in-person brief interventions for substance use among childbearing-aged women.

Amy M Loree, Kimberly A Yonkers, Steven J Ondersma, Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden, Steve Martino

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01539525 (Screening to Augment Referral to Treatment- Project START), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01539525 nacompletednot on this map

Screening to Augment Referral to Treatment- Project START

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2011 to 2015Enrolled439ConditionsAlcohol Abuse, Tobacco Use Disorder, Marijuana Abuse, Substance-Related DisordersArmsMotivational Interview, Treatment as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing the feasibility, usability and acceptability of theDrug and alcohol dependence reports · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy M LoreeVA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT 06516, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St, Suite 900, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: aloree1@hfhs.org.
Kimberly A YonkersDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St, Suite 900, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: kimberly.yonkers@yale.edu.
Steven J OndersmaMerrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, 71 E. Ferry St, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Electronic address: s.ondersma@wayne.edu.
Kathryn Gilstad-HaydenDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St, Suite 900, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: kathryn.gilstad-hayden@yale.edu.
Steve MartinoVA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT 06516, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George St, Suite 900, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: steve.martino@yale.edu.

Funding

Project START: Screening to Augment Referral to TreatmentR01DA027194 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MARTINO, STEVE, YONKERS, KIMBERLY A · 2010 to 2014
$3.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic delivery of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (e-SBIRT) may be a low-cost and high-reach method for screening and brief intervention in health care settings. However, its relative acceptability, ability to build a therapeutic alliance, and delivery of key intervention components compared to in-person SBIRT (SBIRT) is unclear. The association of these factors with intervention outcomes is also not known. We compared SBIRT and e-SBIRT on satisfaction, alliance, and receipt of intervention components, and evaluated the extent to which these intervention dimensions were related to later substance use. Data were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial (N = 439) examining SBIRT, e-SBIRT, and enhanced usual care for childbearing-aged women in two reproductive healthcare clinics (see Martino et al. (2018) for main trial findings). Participants receiving SBIRT or e-SBIRT (N = 270) rated satisfaction and alliance following a single-session, brief intervention, based on motivational interviewing that targeted hazardous substance use (tobacco, alcohol, illicit drugs and prescribed medications). Trained raters coded audio-recorded SBIRT sessions for the presence of six major intervention components, and evaluated the occurrence of these components in the e-SBIRT software. Overall, participants in both groups reported strong satisfaction (on average, "considerably" to "extremely" satisfied) and perceived working alliance (on average, "very often" to "always" allied). SBIRT participants provided higher overall alliance ratings, felt more encouraged to make their own decisions, and rated the intervention's likely helpfulness to other women higher. Fewer e-SBIRT participants received intervention components focusing on personalized feedback, developing importance of and confidence in making changes to substance use, and developing a plan to change, compared to SBIRT participants. However, e-SBIRT participants were equally or more likely to receive components seeking to help them understand their use, discussing reasons for use, and summarizing and supporting what the patients elected to do. Notably, satisfaction, alliance, and number of intervention components received were not associated with total days of substance use. Although we found no evidence that the intervention characteristics evaluated in this study were associated with outcomes, acceptability and alliance may have other important implications. Findings suggest areas for improvement with respect to e-SBIRT satisfaction and alliance formation. ClinicalTrials.govregistration number: NCT01539525.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionTelemedicineTherapeutic AllianceAdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMotivational InterviewingReferral and ConsultationSubstance-Related DisordersAllianceE-interventionsMotivational interviewingSatisfactionSBIRTSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID30797381
PMCPMC7680551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.