ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2019
Minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1-2 and cN0 breast cancer.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Axillary dissection versus axillary observation for low risk, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of chemotherapy for lymph node-positive luminal A subtype breast cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Factors affecting preoperative sentinel lymph nodes contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy impacts axillary lymph node positivity in early breast cancer (cT1-2N0M0) with negative axillary lymph nodes at diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of the number of removed lymph nodes on survival outcome in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Clinical effect of the pathological axillary assessment method in breast cancer without clinical nodal metastasis.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- False-negative frozen section of sentinel nodes in early breast cancer (cT1-2N0) patients.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic value of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases may be minimized by the limited disease burden of lymph node metastases and tailoring adjuvant therapy based on breast cancer biology. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic significance of SLN metastasis in patients with cT1-2N0M0 breast cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween January 2006 and December 2015, 582 patients underwent SLN biopsy for cT1-2N0M0 breast cancers. cN0 was essentially diagnosed by ultrasound sonography. The prognostic values of SLN metastases were retrospectively evaluated.
resultsAmong 582 patients with cT1-2N0M0 breast cancer, 111 patients (19.1%) were positive for SLN metastasis, including 39 cases (6.7%) of micrometastasis and 72 cases (12.4%) of macrometastases. The median size of SLN metastasis was 3.0 mm (range 0.2-16 mm, mean 4.1 mm). In log-rank test, presence of SLN metastasis was not associated with breast cancer recurrence (p = 0.21); 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 93.0% and 96.5%, and 93.0% and 90.4% in the SLN-positive and SLN-negative groups, respectively. In the propensity score matching cohort (n = 178), there was no significant difference in RFS between the SLN-positive and SLN-negative groups (p = 0.90). In Cox regression analysis, a continuous value of Ki67 expression was a significant prognostic factor (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05, p = 0.017).
conclusionSLN metastasis has a minimal impact on RFS for patients with cT1-2N0M0 breast cancer in the modern medical era. A proliferation marker is a better factor for poor prognosis than the presence of SLN metastases in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.