Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30797231›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2019

Minimal prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with cT1-2 and cN0 breast cancer.

Hideo Shigematsu, Mai Nishina, Daisuke Yasui, Taizo Hirata, Shinji Ozaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hideo ShigematsuDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, 3-1, Aoyama-cho, Kure City, Hiroshima, 737-0023, Japan. shigematu1330@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9393-9655
Mai NishinaDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, 3-1, Aoyama-cho, Kure City, Hiroshima, 737-0023, Japan.
Daisuke YasuiDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, 3-1, Aoyama-cho, Kure City, Hiroshima, 737-0023, Japan.
Taizo HirataDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure City, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shinji OzakiDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, 3-1, Aoyama-cho, Kure City, Hiroshima, 737-0023, Japan.
National Hospital Organization · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic value of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases may be minimized by the limited disease burden of lymph node metastases and tailoring adjuvant therapy based on breast cancer biology. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic significance of SLN metastasis in patients with cT1-2N0M0 breast cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween January 2006 and December 2015, 582 patients underwent SLN biopsy for cT1-2N0M0 breast cancers. cN0 was essentially diagnosed by ultrasound sonography. The prognostic values of SLN metastases were retrospectively evaluated.

resultsAmong 582 patients with cT1-2N0M0 breast cancer, 111 patients (19.1%) were positive for SLN metastasis, including 39 cases (6.7%) of micrometastasis and 72 cases (12.4%) of macrometastases. The median size of SLN metastasis was 3.0 mm (range 0.2-16 mm, mean 4.1 mm). In log-rank test, presence of SLN metastasis was not associated with breast cancer recurrence (p = 0.21); 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 93.0% and 96.5%, and 93.0% and 90.4% in the SLN-positive and SLN-negative groups, respectively. In the propensity score matching cohort (n = 178), there was no significant difference in RFS between the SLN-positive and SLN-negative groups (p = 0.90). In Cox regression analysis, a continuous value of Ki67 expression was a significant prognostic factor (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05, p = 0.017).

conclusionSLN metastasis has a minimal impact on RFS for patients with cT1-2N0M0 breast cancer in the modern medical era. A proliferation marker is a better factor for poor prognosis than the presence of SLN metastases in this population.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAxillaBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm MicrometastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerMinimalPrognosisProliferation markerSLN

Identifiers

PMID30797231
PMCPMC6387738
OpenAlexW2941914879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.