ArticleCognition2019
Neural evidence for Bayesian trial-by-trial adaptation on the N400 during semantic priming.
Article in Cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Influence of Prior Semantic Knowledge in Noisy Channel Interpretation.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the compatibility of predictive coding as a model of linguistic predictability effects in reading.Frontiers in cognition · 2026Review
- Lexical Representations of the Native and Second Languages During L2 Word Reading in Chinese-English Bilinguals.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Trouble spots in literary conversation learning: managing bilinguals' cognitive expectation problems using conversational presupposition theory.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Unraveling the mechanism of semantic object-based attention: The role of top-down search strategies.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- A predictive coding model of the N400.Cognition · 2024Article
- Cross-linguistic syntactic priming as rational expectation for syntactic repetition in the bilingual environment.PloS one · 2024Article
- Can prediction error explain predictability effects on the N1 during picture-word verification?Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Multiple predictions during language comprehension: Friends, foes, or indifferent companions?Cognition · 2023Article
- Prediction during language comprehension: what is next?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023Review
- Strategic Processing of Gender Stereotypes in Sentence Comprehension: An ERP Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Semantic surprise predicts the N400 brain potential.Neuroimage. Reports · 2023Article
- Understanding the Effects of Constraint and Predictability in ERP.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Brain Signatures of Embodied Semantics and Language: A Consensus Paper.Journal of cognition · 2023Article
- Cognitive control mediates age-related changes in flexible anticipatory processing during listening comprehension.Brain research · 2021Review
- Rational Adaptation in Lexical Prediction: The Influence of Prediction Strength.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Adaptation in Predictive Prosodic Processing in Bilinguals.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Commentary: Rational Adaptation in Lexical Prediction: The Influence of Prediction Strength.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Impairments in Probabilistic Prediction and Bayesian Learning Can Explain Reduced Neural Semantic Priming in Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When semantic information is activated by a context prior to new bottom-up input (i.e. when a word is predicted), semantic processing of that incoming word is typically facilitated, attenuating the amplitude of the N400 event related potential (ERP) - a direct neural measure of semantic processing. N400 modulation is observed even when the context is a single semantically related "prime" word. This so-called "N400 semantic priming effect" is sensitive to the probability of encountering a related prime-target pair within an experimental block, suggesting that participants may be adapting the strength of their predictions to the predictive validity of their broader experimental environment. We formalize this adaptation using a Bayesian learning model that estimates and updates the probability of encountering a related versus an unrelated prime-target pair on each successive trial. We found that our model's trial-by-trial estimates of target word probability accounted for significant variance in trial-by-trial N400 amplitude. These findings suggest that Bayesian principles contribute to how comprehenders adapt their semantic predictions to the statistical structure of their broader environment, with implications for the functional significance of the N400 component and the predictive nature of language processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.