Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30797087›Full record

ArticleJournal of global antimicrobial resistance2019

Barriers to implementing antimicrobial stewardship programmes in three Saudi hospitals: Evidence from a qualitative study.

Saleh Alghamdi, Nada Atef-Shebl, Zoe Aslanpour, Ilhem Berrou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Saleh AlghamdiDepartment of Clinical & Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Clinical Pharmacy, Albaha University, Albaha, Saudi Arabia.
Nada Atef-SheblDepartment of Clinical & Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Zoe AslanpourDepartment of Clinical & Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Ilhem BerrouFaculty of Health & Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Staple Hill, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK. Electronic address: Ilhem.berrou@uwe.ac.uk.
University of Hertfordshire · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study explored antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) team members' perspectives regarding factors influencing the adoption and implementation of these programmes in Saudi hospitals.

methodsThis was a qualitative study based on face-to-face semistructured interviews with healthcare professionals involved in ASPs and activities across three Ministry of Health (MoH) hospitals in Saudi Arabia (n = 18). Interviews were also conducted with two representatives of a General Directorate of Health Affairs in a Saudi region and two representatives of the Saudi MoH (n = 4) between January-February 2017.

resultsDespite the existence of a national strategy to implement ASPs in Saudi MoH hospitals, their adoption and implementation remains low. Hospitals have their own antimicrobial stewardship policies, but adherence to these is poor. ASP team members highlight that lack of enforcement of policies and guidelines from the MoH and hospital administration is a significant barrier to ASP adoption and implementation. Other barriers include disintegration of teams, poor communication, lack of recruitment/shortage of ASP team members, lack of education and training, and lack of health information technology (IT). Physicians' fears and concerns in relation to liability are also a barrier to their adoption of ASPs.

conclusionThis is the first qualitative study exploring barriers to ASP adoption and implementation in Saudi hospitals from the perspective of ASP team members. Formal endorsement of ASPs from the MoH as well as hospital enforcement of policies and provision of human and health IT resources would improve the adoption and implementation of ASPs in Saudi hospitals.

Indexed as

HospitalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipDrug Resistance, BacterialHealth PersonnelHumansPhysiciansSaudi ArabiaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAdoptionAntimicrobial stewardship programmeASPBarriersHospitalSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID30797087
PMCPMC7104169
OpenAlexW2915115041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.