Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30796837›Full record

ReviewPlant & cell physiology2019

Understanding the Complexity of Iron Sensing and Signaling Cascades in Plants.

Takanori Kobayashi

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant & cell physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Iron Nutrition in Plants: Towards a New Paradigm?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takanori KobayashiResearch Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology, Ishikawa Prefectural University, 1-308 Suematsu, Nonoichi, Ishikawa, Japan.
Ishikawa Prefectural University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under iron-deficient conditions, plants induce the expression of a set of genes involved in iron uptake and translocation. This response to iron deficiency is regulated by transcriptional networks mediated by transcription factors (TFs) and protein-level modification of key factors by ubiquitin ligases. Several of the basic helix-loop-helix TFs and the HRZ/BTS ubiquitin ligases are conserved across graminaceous and non-graminaceous plants. Other regulators are specific, such as IDEF1 and IDEF2 in graminaceous plants and FIT/FER and MYB10/72 in non-graminaceous plants. IMA/FEP peptides positively regulate the iron-deficiency responses in a wide range of plants by unknown mechanisms. Direct binding of iron or other metals to some key regulators, including HRZ/BTS and IDEF1, may be responsible for intracellular iron-sensing and -signaling events. In addition, key TFs such as FIT and IDEF1 interact with various proteins involved in signaling pathways of plant hormones, oxidative stress and metal abundance. Thus, FIT and IDEF1 might function as hubs for the integration of environmental signals to modulate the responses to iron deficiency. In addition to local iron signaling, root iron responses are modulated by shoot-derived long-distance signaling potentially mediated by phloem-mobile substances such as iron, iron chelates and IMA/FEP peptides.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantIronIron DeficienciesPlant Physiological PhenomenaPlantsSignal TransductionIronIronRegulationSensingTranscription factorUbiquitin ligase

Identifiers

PMID30796837
OpenAlexW2916453800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.