ArticleJournal of chromatographic science2019
Global Plasma Profiling for Colorectal Cancer-Associated Volatile Organic Compounds: a Proof-of-Principle Study.
Article in Journal of chromatographic science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of volatile organic compounds in biological samples of colorectal cancer patients using electronic nose-based machine learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exhaled Breath Analysis Using a Novel Electronic Nose for Different Respiratory Disease Entities.Lung · 2025Article
- Systematic Review: Contribution of the Gut Microbiome to the Volatile Metabolic Fingerprint of Colorectal Neoplasia.Metabolites · 2022Review
- Advanced Diagnostic Technology of Volatile Organic Compounds Real Time analysis Analysis From Exhaled Breath of Gastric Cancer Patients Using Proton-Transfer-Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Automating and Extending Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography Data Processing by Interfacing Open-Source and Commercial Software.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Integrating Two-Dimensional Gas and Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for Untargeted Colorectal Cancer Metabolomics: A Proof-of-Principle Study.Metabolites · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) could reflect changes resulting from ongoing pathophysiological processes and altered body metabolisms, and thus have been studied for various types of cancers. We aimed to test an advanced global metabolomic technique to characterize circulating VOCs in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). We employed solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography mass-spectrometry (GC × GC-MS). We analyzed 30 random plasma samples from incident cases of CRC. The 30 samples were from population controls enrolled in a large population-based case-control study. The number of metabolite peaks detected in the cases was significantly lower than that detected in the controls (median 1530 vs. 1694, P = 0.02). Partial least squares-discriminant analysis showed clear VOC profile differences between the CRC and the controls. After adjustment for multiple comparisons at the 5% false discovery rate level, five VOCs were differentially expressed between the cases and the controls. Among these five VOCs, 2,3,4-trimethyl-hexane (decreased) and 2,4-dimethylhept-1-ene (increased) were both lipid peroxidation products but not previously reported for CRC. In summary, this study pointed to an intriguing observation that the richness of volatile metabolites may be reduced in CRC cases and demonstrated the utility of SPME GC × GC-MS in discovery of candidate markers for further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.