ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2019
Plant Approach-Avoidance Response in Locusts Driven by Plant Volatile Sensing at Different Ranges.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anatomical Investigation Reveals a Second Olfactory System in Locusts.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026Article
- Synergistic olfactory processing for social plasticity in desert locusts.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Innate attraction and aversion to odors in locusts.PloS one · 2023Article
- Sensilla-Specific Expression of Odorant Receptors in the Desert LocustFrontiers in physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain how herbivorous insects approach plants by sensing plant volatiles. Insect antennae and maxillary palps are believed to have crucial roles in the detection of host plant volatiles. However, few studies have assessed the roles of these olfactory organs in food selection in terms of the effects of individual volatile compounds from plants at various distances. Therefore, we assessed the palp-opening response (POR), biting response, and selection behavior of locust (Locusta migratoria) nymphs in response to volatile compounds from host and non-host plants at various distances. Thirty odorants were identified as the active volatiles to locust by the POR tests. At a distance of 3 m, locusts were attracted to a few common volatiles (1% v/v) of both host and non-host plants, while few components of volatiles acted as repellants at this distance. At a distance of 1 m, locusts responded more readily to volatile compounds. At a distance of 1 cm, locusts mainly used their palps to detect volatiles. However, some components that acted as attractants at long distances had no effect on the biting response at a short distance. Together, the results suggest that plant volatiles generally attract locust nymphs at long distances, but the effects are influenced by distance and concentration. Moreover, there are substantial functional differences in the use of antennae and palps for detecting volatiles at various distances. Overall, the mechanism of food selection by locusts via olfaction can be divided into several continuous ranges according to the sensitivities of the two chemosensory organs and the characteristics of the plant odorants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.