Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30796674›Full record

SynthesisClinical child and family psychology review2019

Psychometric Properties of Parent Outcome Measures Used in RCTs of Antenatal and Early Years Parent Programs: A Systematic Review.

Sarah L Blower, Nicole Gridley, Abby Dunn, Tracey Bywater, Zoe Hindson, Maria Bryant

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah L BlowerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. sarah.blower@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9168-9995
Nicole GridleyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1881-5502
Abby DunnDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7871-8413
Tracey BywaterDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7207-8753
Zoe HindsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7690-4098
Maria BryantClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 13/93/10Department of Health PHR/13/93/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parenting programs are effective in the early intervention and treatment of children's social, emotional and behavioural difficulties. However, inconsistency in the use of outcome measures limits the comparability of programs and creates challenges for practitioners seeking to monitor progress of families in their care. A systematic review was conducted to identify measures, appraise their psychometric properties and ease of implementation, with the overall objective of recommending a small battery of measures for use by researchers and practitioners. This article provides an overview of the most commonly used measures in experimental evaluations of parenting programs delivered to parents of children up to, and including, the age of 5 years (including antenatal programs). An in-depth appraisal of the psychometric properties and ease of implementation of parent outcome measures is also presented (findings in relation to child and dyadic outcome measures are presented elsewhere). Following a systematic search, 64 measures were identified as being used in three or more of 279 included evaluation studies. Data on the psychometric properties of 18 parent outcome measures were synthesised from 87 development and validation studies. Whilst it was not possible to identify a definitive battery of recommended measures, we are able to recommend specific measures that could be prioritised in further research and development and hold promise for those seeking to monitor the outcomes of parents and children in receipt of parenting programs.

Indexed as

ParentingPsychometricsChildChild Behavior DisordersChild, PreschoolEarly Intervention, EducationalEducation, NonprofessionalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyPrenatal CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCOSMINOutcome measuresParentingPsychometric propertiesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30796674
PMCPMC6669247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.