Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30796618›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2019

A review of eye tracking for understanding and improving diagnostic interpretation.

Tad T Brunyé, Trafton Drew, Donald L Weaver, Joann G Elmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Effects of Prior Diagnosis on Second Opinions and Pathologist Viewing Behaviors: Results from a Randomized Trial in Breast Pathology.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Gaze Mapping and Observational Behavior During Nasal Endoscopy.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Characterizing Interpretive and Diagnostic Competency Development in Pathology Training.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tad T BrunyéCenter for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, 200 Boston Ave., Suite 3000, Medford, MA, 02155, USA. tbruny01@tufts.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8788-8764
Trafton DrewDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 1530 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Donald L WeaverDepartment of Pathology and University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, 111 Colchester Ave., Burlington, VT, 05401, USA.
Joann G ElmoreDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California at Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

Funding

Reader Accuracy in Pathology Interpretation and Diagnosis: Perception and Cognition (RAPID-PC)R01CA225585 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ELMORE, JOANN G, WEAVER, DONALD LEE · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Reducing Errors in the Diagnosis of Melanoma and Melanocytic LesionsR01CA201376 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ELMORE, JOANN G, KERR, KATHLEEN F. · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
National Institutes of Health RO1 CA201376National Institutes of Health RO1 CA225585NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201376NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inspecting digital imaging for primary diagnosis introduces perceptual and cognitive demands for physicians tasked with interpreting visual medical information and arriving at appropriate diagnoses and treatment decisions. The process of medical interpretation and diagnosis involves a complex interplay between visual perception and multiple cognitive processes, including memory retrieval, problem-solving, and decision-making. Eye-tracking technologies are becoming increasingly available in the consumer and research markets and provide novel opportunities to learn more about the interpretive process, including differences between novices and experts, how heuristics and biases shape visual perception and decision-making, and the mechanisms underlying misinterpretation and misdiagnosis. The present review provides an overview of eye-tracking technology, the perceptual and cognitive processes involved in medical interpretation, how eye tracking has been employed to understand medical interpretation and promote medical education and training, and some of the promises and challenges for future applications of this technology.

Indexed as

Eye trackingMedical decision-makingMedical informaticsVisual perceptionVisual search

Identifiers

PMID30796618
PMCPMC6515770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.