Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30796054›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of ophthalmology2019

Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial.

Sean Joseph McCafferty, Kyle Tetrault, Ann McColgin, Warren Chue, Jason Levine, Melissa Muller

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02989909 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Evaluation of CATS Tonometer Prism

TypeinterventionalSponsorIntuor Technologies, Inc.Ran2017 to 2017Enrolled86ConditionsOcular HypertensionArmsCATS tonometer prism, Goldmann tonometer prism
NCT02990169 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Evaluation of CATS Tonometer Prism

TypeinterventionalSponsorIntuor Technologies, Inc.Ran2017 to 2018Enrolled38ConditionsOcular HypotensionArmsCATS tonometer prism, Goldmann Tonometer prism
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sean Joseph McCaffertyArizona Eye Consultants, Tucson, Arizona, USA sjmccafferty66@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-5615
Kyle TetraultArizona Eye Consultants, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Ann McColginArizona Eye Consultants, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Warren ChueArizona Eye Consultants, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Jason LevineArizona Eye Consultants, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Melissa MullerArizona Eye Consultants, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

Funding

Goldmann Contact Tonometry with Optimized Error CorrectionR43EY026821 · NEI · INTUOR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC · PI MCCAFFERTY, SEAN J · 2016 to 2016
$175k
NEI NIH HHS R43 EY026821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClinically evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) prism and a modified surface Goldmann prism examining measurement differences correlated to central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal hysteresis (CH) values.

designProspective, open-label, randomised, controlled, multicentre reference device accuracy analysis.

methodsA GAT and a modified surface GAT prism measured IOP on 243 unique eyes. The study design and methodology complied with International Standard Organization (ISO) tonometer evaluation guidelines, except the inclusion of thin (<500 µm) and thick (>600 µm) corneas. All eyes were randomised to IOP measurement by one of five standard Goldmann prisms and five modified prisms. Pressures were measured by six investigators, two times with each prism for a total of 1936 IOP measurements. Analysis included a multiple linear regression including CCT and CH correlation.

resultsThe difference in IOP measurements of the standard and modified Goldmann prisms correlated well to CCT particularly in thin (<500 µm) and thick (>600 µm) corneas (R DISCUSSION: The paired IOP measurement difference between GAT and a modified surface Goldmann replacement prism indicated a statistically significant correlation to CCT and CH. A simple modified replacement prism for any Goldmann-type tonometer may significantly improve IOP measurement accuracy by minimising corneal biomechanical errors associated with CCT and CH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02990169 and NCT02989909.

Indexed as

CorneaIntraocular PressureTonometry, OcularAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaCorneal PachymetryFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of Resultscentral corneal thicknessCorneacorneal biomechanicscorneal hysteresisGlaucomaIntraocular pressuretonometry

Identifiers

PMID30796054
PMCPMC6900223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.