Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30795923›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric oncology2019

Potentially inappropriate medications defined by STOPP criteria in older patients with breast and colorectal cancer.

Meghan S Karuturi, Holly M Holmes, Xiudong Lei, Michael Johnson, Carlos H Barcenas, Scott B Cantor, Gary E Gallick, Robert C Bast, Sharon H Giordano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Deprescribing in palliative patients with cancer: a concise review of tools and guidelines.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meghan S KaruturiBreast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States. Electronic address: mskaruturi@mdanderson.org.
Holly M HolmesGeriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States.
Xiudong LeiHealth Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Michael JohnsonUniversity of Houston College of Pharmacy, USA.
Carlos H BarcenasBreast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Scott B CantorHealth Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Gary E GallickGenitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Robert C BastExperimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Sharon H GiordanoBreast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Paul Calabresi Clinical Oncology AwardK12CA088084 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI David S. Hong, Scott Kopetz · 2000 to 2026
$14.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeScreening for potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) is recommended in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy, given the concern for adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions and non-adherence. Our objective was to determine the impact of PIM on outcomes in patients with breast and colorectal cancers receiving chemotherapy.

methodsWe used data from the SEER-Medicare database, including patients >/= 66 years old with a diagnosis of Stage II/III breast and colorectal cancer made between 7/1/2007-12/31/2009. We used modified STOPP criteria to define baseline PIM as a dichotomous variable in the 4 months prior to diagnosis. STOPP criteria was used based on its performance as a robust measure of PIM. Outcomes measures included ER visits, hospitalizations, and death within 3 months from the last chemotherapy, and a composite of the three. We used Chi-square or Fisher's exact test to determine associations of PIM with covariates and outcomes, and Cox proportional hazards (PH) model for the time-to-event analysis.

resultsFinal analysis included 1,595 patients with breast cancer and 1,528 patients with colorectal cancer. Frequency of baseline PIM by STOPP was 31.5% in the breast and 30.9% in the colorectal cohort. In the breast cohort, associations with the composite outcome in the Cox PH model included disease stage, comorbidity, medication number and baseline ER visits/hospitalization. Age, gender, race, comorbidity and baseline ER visits/hospitalization were associated in the colorectal cohort. PIM was not associated with outcomes in either cohort, aside from hospitalization in the breast.

conclusionsWe found no consistent association between pre-chemotherapy PIM defined by STOPP and outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMass ScreeningMedicareNeoplasm StagingPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListProportional Hazards ModelsSEER ProgramAntineoplastic AgentsBreast cancerColorectal cancerGeriatric oncologyHealth outcomesInappropriate medicationsPolypharmacySTOPP criteria

Identifiers

PMID30795923
PMCPMC6699920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.