Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30795784›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2019

Aberrant fatty acid profile and FFAR4 signaling confer endocrine resistance in breast cancer.

Xiao Chu, Qi Zhou, Yingchun Xu, Jingting Jiang, Qing Li, Qianjun Zhou, Qiong Wu, Min Jin, Hui Wang, Yuting Gu and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phase separation of DDHD2 remodels lipid metabolism to dictate treatment sensitivity in luminal breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Obesity and endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer: Mechanistic insights and perspectives.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao ChuDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institutes for Translational Medicine, Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qi ZhouDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institutes for Translational Medicine, Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yingchun XuDepartment of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SJTUSM), Shanghai, China.
Jingting JiangDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institutes for Translational Medicine, Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qing LiDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institutes for Translational Medicine, Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qianjun ZhouKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Qiong WuKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Min JinKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Hui WangDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institutes for Translational Medicine, Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yuting GuDepartment of Oncology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SJTUSM), Shanghai, China.
Xue WangKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Bei WangKey Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Songbing HeDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institutes for Translational Medicine, Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaozhou HeDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institutes for Translational Medicine, Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Changping WuDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institutes for Translational Medicine, Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China. wcpjjt@163.com.
Fengchun ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital and Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, SJTUSM, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. fczhang2004@163.com.
Yanyun ZhangDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institutes for Translational Medicine, Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China. yyzhang@sibs.ac.cn.
Soochow University · CNShanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNRenji Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNSuzhou Kowloon Hospital · CN

Funding

Key R&D Project of Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province BE2016660Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2014CB943300Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2015CB943300National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China 2015BAI12B12National Natural Science Foundation of China 81130057National Natural Science Foundation of China 81201905National Natural Science Foundation of China 81373164National Natural Science Foundation of China 81502506National Natural Science Foundation of China 81502607the Engineering Research Center for Tumor Immunotherapy of Jiangsu BM2014404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that fatty acid receptor FFAR4 plays a tumor-promoting role in adipose tissue-adjacent malignancies, but its clinical relevance remains unexplored. Here, we investigated the clinical significance and underlying mechanisms of FFAR4 in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HRPBC).

methodsFFAR4 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in an exploration cohort of 307 breast cancer cases collected from two independent institutes. Two public breast cancer microarray datasets served as validation cohorts. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was employed to identify FFAR4 ligands in normal and cancerous breast tissues. Survival analyses were performed in all cohorts and designated molecular subgroups. Mechanistic studies were performed in vitro in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T-47D.

resultsAberrant FFAR4 expression and endogenous FFAR4 ligands were identified in breast cancer tissues, five FFAR4 ligands showed significantly elevated proportions in cancerous versus normal tissues. In the exploration cohort, FFAR4 was demonstrated as an independent prognostic factor for recurrences (HR: 2.183, 95% CI: 1.360-3.504, P = 0.001) and breast cancer-specific deaths (HR: 2.102, 95% CI: 1.173-3.766, P = 0.013) in HRPBC cases. In contrast, FFAR4 expression was not associated with prognosis in hormone receptor-negative cases. In the validation cohorts, FFAR4 mRNA levels were also observed to be associated with disease recurrence in estrogen receptor-positive cases, but not so in estrogen receptor-negative cases. FFAR4 activation by endogenous ligands and a synthetic ligand TUG891 significantly dampened tamoxifen's efficacy on HRPBC cells, whereas FFAR4 knockdown or antagonist AH7614 abrogated this effect. Furthermore, FFAR4-induced tamoxifen resistance was dependent on ERK and AKT pathways in HRPBC.

conclusionsOur results establish a novel role of FFAR4 and its ligands in the complicated interactions between tissue lipid profile and cancer biology. FFAR4 signaling confers tamoxifen resistance in HRPBC cell line and FFAR4 expression can serve as a prognostic biomarker for tamoxifen-treated HRPBC patients. FFAR4 may serve as a potential target for anti-breast cancer therapies, especially in endocrine resistant cases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCohort StudiesDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFatty AcidsFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalFatty AcidsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRNA, MessengerTamoxifenBiomarkerEndocrine resistanceFatty acid receptorFatty acidsFFAR4Gas chromatography-mass spectrometryHormone receptor-positive breast cancerTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID30795784
PMCPMC6387561
OpenAlexW2922535572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.