Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30795750›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2019

Analysis of sea star larval regeneration reveals conserved processes of whole-body regeneration across the metazoa.

Gregory A Cary, Andrew Wolff, Olga Zueva, Joseph Pattinato, Veronica F Hinman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative analysis ofDiscover developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Hazards of Regeneration: From Morgan's Legacy to Evo-Devo.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Expression ofGenes · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gregory A CaryDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Mellon Institute, 4400 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Andrew WolffDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Mellon Institute, 4400 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Olga ZuevaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Mellon Institute, 4400 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Joseph PattinatoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Mellon Institute, 4400 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Veronica F HinmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Mellon Institute, 4400 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. veronica@cmu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3414-1357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetazoan lineages exhibit a wide range of regenerative capabilities that vary among developmental stage and tissue type. The most robust regenerative abilities are apparent in the phyla Cnidaria, Platyhelminthes, and Echinodermata, whose members are capable of whole-body regeneration (WBR). This phenomenon has been well characterized in planarian and hydra models, but the molecular mechanisms of WBR are less established within echinoderms, or any other deuterostome system. Thus, it is not clear to what degree aspects of this regenerative ability are shared among metazoa.

resultsWe characterize regeneration in the larval stage of the Bat Star (Patiria miniata). Following bisection along the anterior-posterior axis, larvae progress through phases of wound healing and re-proportioning of larval tissues. The overall number of proliferating cells is reduced following bisection, and we find evidence for a re-deployment of genes with known roles in embryonic axial patterning. Following axial respecification, we observe a significant localization of proliferating cells to the wound region. Analyses of transcriptome data highlight the molecular signatures of functions that are common to regeneration, including specific signaling pathways and cell cycle controls. Notably, we find evidence for temporal similarities among orthologous genes involved in regeneration from published Platyhelminth and Cnidarian regeneration datasets.

conclusionsThese analyses show that sea star larval regeneration includes phases of wound response, axis respecification, and wound-proximal proliferation. Commonalities of the overall process of regeneration, as well as gene usage between this deuterostome and other species with divergent evolutionary origins reveal a deep similarity of whole-body regeneration among the metazoa.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsLarvaRegenerationStarfishTranscriptomeEchinodermRegenerationSea starTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30795750
PMCPMC6385403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.