Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30795714›Full record

Observational studyVascular medicine (London, England)2019

Supervised exercise therapy and revascularization: Single-center experience of intermittent claudication management.

Elke Bouwens, Sanne Klaphake, Karin J Weststrate, Joep Aw Teijink, Hence Jm Verhagen, Sanne E Hoeks, Ellen V Rouwet

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Vascular medicine (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elke Bouwens1 Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1166-1085
Sanne Klaphake2 Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Karin J Weststrate2 Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joep Aw Teijink3 Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Hence Jm Verhagen2 Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sanne E Hoeks5 Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ellen V Rouwet2 Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines recommend supervised exercise therapy (SET) as first-line treatment for intermittent claudication. However, the use of revascularization is widespread. We addressed the effectiveness of preventing (additional) invasive revascularization after primary SET or revascularization based on lesion and patient characteristics. In this single-center, retrospective, cohort study, 474 patients with intermittent claudication were included. Patients with occlusive disease of the aortoiliac tract and/or common femoral artery (inflow) were primarily considered for revascularization, while patients with more distal disease (outflow) were primarily considered for SET. In total, 232 patients were referred for SET and 242 patients received revascularization. The primary outcome was freedom from (additional) intervention, analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Secondary outcomes were survival, critical ischemia, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), and an increase in maximum walking distance. In the SET-first strategy, 71% of patients had significant outflow lesions. Freedom from intervention was 0.90 ± 0.02 at 1-year and 0.82 ± 0.03 at 2-year follow-up. In the primary revascularization group, 90% of patients had inflow lesions. Freedom from additional intervention was 0.78 ± 0.03 at 1-year and only 0.65 ± 0.04 at 2-year follow-up, despite freedom from TLR of 0.91 ± 0.02 and 0.85 ± 0.03 at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively. In conclusion, SET was effective in preventing invasive treatment for patients with mainly outflow lesions. In contrast, secondary intervention rates following our strategy of primary revascularization for inflow lesions were unexpectedly high. These findings further support the guideline recommendations of SET as first-line treatment for all patients with intermittent claudication irrespective of level of disease.

Indexed as

AgedExercise TherapyExercise ToleranceFemaleHumansIntermittent ClaudicationMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPeripheral Arterial DiseaseProgression-Free SurvivalRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsVascular Surgical Proceduresbypassendarterectomyendovascular therapylower extremityperipheral artery disease (PAD)revascularizationsupervised exercise therapy

Identifiers

PMID30795714
PMCPMC6535809
OpenAlexW2917024669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.