Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30795634›Full record

ArticleCells2019

In-Depth Proteome Analysis Highlights HepaRG Cells as a Versatile Cell System Surrogate for Primary Human Hepatocytes.

Georg Tascher, Audrey Burban, Sandrine Camus, Marine Plumel, Stéphanie Chanon, Remy Le Guevel, Valery Shevchenko, Alain Van Dorsselaer, Etienne Lefai, Christiane Guguen-Guillouzo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Georg TascherLaboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse BioOrganique, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, F-67087 Strasbourg, France. tascher@med.uni-frankfurt.de.
Audrey BurbanINSERM U1241 NuMeCan, Université de Rennes 1, F-35033 Rennes, France. burban.au@gmail.com.
Sandrine CamusBiopredic International, Parc d'Affaires de la Bretêche, F-35760 St Grégoire, France. sandrine.camus@biopredic.com.
Marine PlumelLaboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse BioOrganique, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, F-67087 Strasbourg, France. marine.plumel@gmail.com.
Stéphanie ChanonCarMeN Laboratory, INSERM, INRA, University of Lyon, F-69310 Pierre-Bénite, France. stephanie.chanon@univ-lyon1.fr.
Remy Le GuevelImPACcell platform, Biosit, Université de Rennes 1, F-35043 Rennes, France. remy.leguevel@univ-rennes1.fr.
Valery ShevchenkoBiopredic International, Parc d'Affaires de la Bretêche, F-35760 St Grégoire, France. valery.shevchenko@biopredic.com.
Alain Van DorsselaerLaboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse BioOrganique, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, F-67087 Strasbourg, France. vandors@unistra.fr.
Etienne LefaiCarMeN Laboratory, INSERM, INRA, University of Lyon, F-69310 Pierre-Bénite, France. etienne.lefai@inra.fr.
Christiane Guguen-GuillouzoINSERM U1241 NuMeCan, Université de Rennes 1, F-35033 Rennes, France. christiane.guillouzo@univ-rennes1.fr.
Fabrice BertileLaboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse BioOrganique, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, F-67087 Strasbourg, France. fbertile@unistra.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRBiopredic (France) · FRInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRGoethe University Frankfurt · DEStructure Fédérative de Recherche en Biologie et Santé de Rennes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Of the hepatic cell lines developed for in vitro studies of hepatic functions as alternatives to primary human hepatocytes, many have lost major liver-like functions, but not HepaRG cells. The increasing use of the latter worldwide raises the need for establishing the reference functional status of early biobanked HepaRG cells. Using deep proteome and secretome analyses, the levels of master regulators of the hepatic phenotype and of the structural elements ensuring biliary polarity were found to be close to those in primary hepatocytes. HepaRG cells proved to be highly differentiated, with functional mitochondria, hepatokine secretion abilities, and an adequate response to insulin. Among differences between primary human hepatocytes and HepaRG cells, the factors that possibly support HepaRG transdifferentiation properties are discussed. The HepaRG cell system thus appears as a robust surrogate for primary hepatocytes, which is versatile enough to study not only xenobiotic detoxification, but also the control of hepatic energy metabolism, secretory function and disease-related mechanisms.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorEnergy MetabolismFemaleHepatocytesHumansInactivation, MetabolicInsulinPhenotypeProteomeProteomicsSignal TransductionInsulinProteomedetoxificationHepaRG cellshepatic phenotypeHepatocytesliver cell linesliver diseasesliver metabolismproteomesecretometransdifferentiation

Identifiers

PMID30795634
PMCPMC6406872
OpenAlexW2916303558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.