ReviewViruses2019
Review in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human papillomaviruses: Knowns, mysteries, and unchartered territories.Journal of medical virology · 2023Review
- Prevention and Treatment of HPV-Induced Skin Tumors.Cancers · 2023Review
- Review
- Isoforms of the Papillomavirus Major Capsid Protein Differ in Their Ability to Block Viral Spread and Tumor Formation.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Next generation L2-based HPV vaccines cross-protect against cutaneous papillomavirus infection and tumor development.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Three Immunocompetent Small Animal Models That Do Not Support Zika Virus Infection.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Hematology and Clinical Chemistry Reference Ranges for Laboratory-Bred Natal Multimammate Mice (Viruses · 2021Article
- Identification and Elimination of the Clinically Relevant Multi-Resistant Environmental BacteriaMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Development of assisted reproductive technologies in small animal species for their efficient preservation and production.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2020Review
- Expression of different L1 isoforms ofeLife · 2020Article
- Mus musculus Papillomavirus 1: a New Frontier in Animal Models of Papillomavirus Pathogenesis.Journal of virology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Replacements of animal models by advanced in vitro systems in biomedical research, despite exceptions, are currently still not satisfactory in reproducing the whole complexity of pathophysiological mechanisms that finally lead to disease. Therefore, preclinical models are additionally required to reflect analogous in vivo situations as found in humans. Despite proven limitations of both approaches, only a combined experimental arrangement guarantees generalizability of results and their transfer to the clinics. Although the laboratory mouse still stands as a paradigm for many scientific discoveries and breakthroughs, it is mandatory to broaden our view by also using nontraditional animal models. The present review will first reflect the value of experimental systems in life science and subsequently describes the preclinical rodent model
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.