Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794941›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2019

Global infection prevention gaps, needs, and utilization of educational resources: A cross-sectional assessment by the International Society for Infectious Diseases.

Angel N Desai, John W Ramatowski, Britta Lassmann, Alison Holmes, Shaheen Mehtar, Gonzalo Bearman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angel N DesaiInternational Society for Infectious Diseases, Brookline, MA, United States; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: angel.desai@isid.org.
John W RamatowskiInternational Society for Infectious Diseases, Brookline, MA, United States.
Britta LassmannInternational Society for Infectious Diseases, Brookline, MA, United States.
Alison HolmesInternational Society for Infectious Diseases, Brookline, MA, United States; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Shaheen MehtarInternational Society for Infectious Diseases, Brookline, MA, United States; Unit for Infection Prevention and Control, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Gonzalo BearmanInternational Society for Infectious Diseases, Brookline, MA, United States; Virginia Commonwealth University, Division of Infectious Diseases, Richmond, VA, United States.

Funding

PROGRAM FOR AIDS CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING (PACRT)T32AI007433 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MARK J SIEDNER · 1992 to 2026
$11.4M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Guide to Infection Control in the Hospital (Guide) is an open access resource produced by the International Society for Infectious Diseases (ISID) to assist in the prevention of infection acquisition and transmission worldwide. A survey was distributed to 8055 current Guide users to understand their needs.

methodsThe survey consisted of 48-questions regarding infection prevention and control (IPC) availability and needs. Dichotomous questions, Likert scale-type questions, and open-and closed-ended questions were used.

resultsRespondents (n=1121) from 194 countries and six WHO regions participated in the survey. 43% (488) identified as physicians. Personal protective equipment (PPE) availability, training, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing varied between regions. Only 11% of respondents from low-income countries reported consistent access to respiratory equipment, 12% to isolation gowns, 4% to negative pressure rooms or personnel trained in IPC, and 20% to antimicrobial resistance testing. This differed significantly to high and upper middle-income resource settings (p<0.05). 80% of all respondents used smartphones or tablets at the workplace.

conclusionsThis survey demonstrates varied access to IPC equipment and training between high and low-income settings worldwide. Our results demonstrated many respondents across all regions utilize mobile technology, providing opportunities for rapid distribution of resource specific, up-to-date IPC content.

Indexed as

Infection ControlCell PhoneCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesDrug Resistance, MicrobialGlobal HealthHealth ResourcesHealth Services ResearchHospitalsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAntimicrobial resistanceInfection controlLow and middle-income countriesMobile technologyPreventionTechnology

Identifiers

PMID30794941
PMCPMC6500476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.