ArticleAnaerobe2019
Clostridioides difficile ribotypes isolated from domestic environment and from patients in Bangladesh.
Article in Anaerobe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Clostridioides difficile contamination in healthcare and non-healthcare environments: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.International health · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Multi-country surveillance of Clostridioides difficile demonstrates high prevalence of spores in non-healthcare environmental settings.Anaerobe · 2022Article
- High contamination rates of shoes of veterinarians, veterinary support staff and veterinary students with Clostridioides difficile spores.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an emerging but often understudied infectious disease in developing countries. This study was aimed to isolate and characterize C. difficile from shoe sole swabs and diarrheal patient's stool samples in Bangladesh. We collected 94 shoe sole swabs samples from urban communities in Dhaka and 208 diarrheal stool samples from hospitalized patients over a period of 4 months. Samples were incubated anaerobically for C. difficile growth, confirmed toxigenic, and PCR-ribotyped. Eleven of 94 (11.7%) shoe sole swabs and 4 of 208 (1.9%) stool samples were culture positive of which 9 shoe sole isolates were toxigenic. Six PCR ribotypes from the 9 toxigenic isolates were identified with ribotype F014-020 being the most common (n = 4; 44%). The recently identified ribotype 106 strain was also identified. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of C. difficile culture, isolation and characterization from environmental sources in Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.