ArticlePloS one2019
Evaluation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes for yield, water use efficiency, and root traits.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulsating Drought and Insect Herbivory Cause Differential Effects on Soybean (Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- From phenotyping to genetic mapping: identifying water-stress adaptations in legume root traits.BMC plant biology · 2024Review
- Resilience of soybean genotypes to drought stress during the early vegetative stage.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Determination of Morpho-Physiological Traits for Assessing Drought Tolerance in Sugarcane.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effects of fast and slow-wilting soybean genotypes on fall armyworm (Communicative & integrative biology · 2024Article
- Review
- A novel method for irrigating plants, tracking water use, and imposing water deficits in controlled environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Selecting putative drought-tolerance markers in two contrasting soybeans.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Water Stress Alters Morphophysiological, Grain Quality and Vegetation Indices of Soybean Cultivars.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genetic variation for effects of drought stress on yield formation traits among commercial soybean [Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Parsimonious root systems and better root distribution can improve biomass production and yield of soybean.PloS one · 2022Article
- Physiological and Morphological Responses of Okra (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Root Trait Variation in Lentil (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Analysis of genome variants in dwarf soybean lines obtained in F6 derived from cross of normal parents (cultivated and wild soybean).Genomics & informatics · 2021Article
- Soil Water Deficit and Fertilizer Placement Effects on Root Biomass Distribution, Soil Water Extraction, Water Use, Yield, and Yield Components of Soybean [Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Research Progress and Perspective on Drought Stress in Legumes: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drought stress has been identified as the major environmental factor limiting soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield worldwide. Current breeding efforts in soybean largely focus on identifying genotypes with high seed yield and drought tolerance. Water use efficiency (WUE) that results in greater yield per unit rainfall is an important parameter in determining crop yields in many production systems, and is often related with crop drought tolerance. Even though roots are major plant organs that perceive and respond to drought stress, their utility in improving soybean yield and WUE under different environmental and management conditions are largely unclear. The objectives of this research was to evaluate soybean cultivars and breeding and germplasm lines for yield, WUE, root penetrability of hardpan, and root morphology. Field experiments were conducted at two locations in South Carolina (southeastern United States) during the 2017 cropping season to test the genotypes for yield and root morphology under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. Two independent controlled-environmental experiments were conducted to test the genotypes for WUE and root penetrability of synthetic hardpans. The slow wilting lines NTCPR94-5157 and N09-13890 had equal or greater yield than the checks- cultivar NC-Raleigh and the elite South Carolina breeding line SC07-1518RR, under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. The high yielding genotypes NTCPR94-5157, N09-13890, and SC07-1518RR exhibited root parsimony (reduced root development). This supported the recent hypothesis in literature that root parsimony would have adaptational advantage to improve yield under high input field conditions. The high yielding genotypes NTCPR94-5157, N09-13890, NC-Raleigh, and SC07-1518RR and a cultivar Boggs (intermediate in yield) possessed high WUE and had increased root penetrability of hardpans. These genotypes offer useful genetic materials for soybean breeding programs for improving yield, drought tolerance, and/or hardpan penetrability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.