Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794645›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Effective coverage of essential antenatal care interventions: A cross-sectional study of public primary healthcare clinics in the West Bank.

Mahima Venkateswaran, Binyam Bogale, Khadija Abu Khader, Tamara Awwad, Ingrid K Friberg, Buthaina Ghanem, Taghreed Hijaz, Kjersti Mørkrid, J Frederik Frøen

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mahima VenkateswaranGlobal Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1226-5685
Binyam BogaleGlobal Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Khadija Abu KhaderPalestinian National Institute of Public Health, World Health Organization, Ramallah, Palestine.
Tamara AwwadPalestinian National Institute of Public Health, World Health Organization, Ramallah, Palestine.
Ingrid K FribergGlobal Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Buthaina GhanemPalestinian National Institute of Public Health, World Health Organization, Ramallah, Palestine.
Taghreed HijazMinistry of Health, Ramallah, Palestine.
Kjersti MørkridGlobal Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
J Frederik FrøenGlobal Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9390-8509
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NONational Institute of Public Health · SIMinistry of Agriculture · PS

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe proportion of women attending four or more antenatal care (ANC) visits is widely used for monitoring, but provides limited information on quality of care. Effective coverage metrics, assessing if ANC interventions are completely delivered, can identify critical gaps in healthcare service delivery. We aimed to measure coverage of at least one screening and effective coverage of ANC interventions in the public health system in the West Bank, Palestine, and to explore associations between infrastructure-related and maternal sociodemographic variables and effective coverage.

methodsWe used data from paper-based clinical records of 1369 pregnant women attending ANC in 17 primary healthcare clinics. Infrastructure-related variables were derived from a 2014 national inventory assessment of clinics. Sample size calculations were made to detect effective coverage ranging 40-60% with a 2-3% margin of error, clinics were selected by probability sampling. We calculated inverse probability weighted percentages of: effective coverage of appropriate number and timing of screenings of ANC interventions; and coverage of at least one screening.

resultsCoverage of one screening and effective coverage of ANC interventions were notably different for screening for: hypertension (98% vs. 10%); fetal growth abnormalities (66% vs. 6%); anemia (93% vs. 14%); gestational diabetes (93% vs. 34%), and antenatal ultrasound (74% vs. 24%). Clinics with a laboratory and ultrasound generally performed better in terms of effective coverage, and maternal sociodemographic factors had no associations with effective coverage estimates. Only 13% of the women attended ANC visits according to the recommended national schedule, driving effective coverage down.

conclusionIndicators for ANC monitoring and their definitions can have important consequences for quantifying health system performance and identifying issues with care provision. To achieve more effective coverage in public primary care clinics in the West Bank, efforts should be made to improve care provision according to prescribed guidelines.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsPrenatal CarePrimary Health CareRegistriesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIsraelPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID30794645
PMCPMC6386267
OpenAlexW2918098127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.