Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794644›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Widespread insecticide resistance in Aedes aegypti L. from New Mexico, U.S.A.

Yashoda Kandel, Julia Vulcan, Stacy D Rodriguez, Emily Moore, Hae-Na Chung, Soumi Mitra, Joel J Cordova, Kalli J L Martinez, Alex S Moon, Aditi Kulkarni and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MaAzaR Influences Virulence ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Worldwide Status of Insecticide Resistance ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Organophosphate Resistance inReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yashoda KandelDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Julia VulcanDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Stacy D RodriguezDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Emily MooreDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Hae-Na ChungDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Soumi MitraDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Joel J CordovaDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Kalli J L MartinezDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Alex S MoonDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Aditi KulkarniDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Paul EttestadNew Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe, NM, United States of America.
Sandra MelmanNew Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe, NM, United States of America.
Jiannong XuDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Michaela BuenemannDepartment of Geography, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Kathryn A HanleyDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.
Immo A HansenDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6560-2606
New Mexico State University · USNew Mexico Department of Health · US

Funding

RISE PROGRAM AT NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITYR25GM061222 · NIGMS · NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY LAS CRUCES · PI HOUSTON, JESSICA PEREA, REDDI, LAKSHMI · 2000 to 2022
$21.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM061222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAedes aegypti mosquitoes are vectors of a variety of emerging viral pathogens, including yellow fever, dengue, chikungunya, and Zika virus. This species has established endemic populations in all cities across southern New Mexico sampled to date. Presently, control of Aedes-borne viruses relies on deployment of insecticides to suppress mosquito populations, but the evolution of insecticide resistance threatens the success of vector control programs. While insecticide resistance is quite common in Ae. aegypti field populations across much of the U.S., the resistance status of this species in populations from New Mexico has not previously been assessed.

resultsFirst, we collected information on pesticide use in cities in southern New Mexico and found that the most commonly used active ingredients were pyrethroids. The use of insecticides with the same mode-of-action over multiple years is likely to promote the evolution of resistance. To determine if there was evidence of resistance in some cities in southern New Mexico, we collected Ae. aegypti from the same cities and established laboratory strains to assess resistance to pyrethroid insecticides and, for a subset of populations, to organophosphate insecticides. F2 or F4 generation mosquitoes were assessed for insecticide resistance using bottle test bioassays. The majority of the populations from New Mexico that we analyzed were resistant to the pyrethroids permethrin and deltamethrin. A notable exception to this trend were mosquitoes from Alamogordo, a city that did not report using pyrethroid insecticides for vector control. We screened individuals from each population for known knock down resistance (kdr) mutations via PCR and found a strong association between the presences of the F1534C kdr mutation in the para gene of Ae. aegypti (homologue to F1534C in Musca domestica L.) and pyrethroid resistance.

conclusionHigh-level pyrethroid resistance is common in Ae. aegypti from New Mexico and geographic variation in such resistance is likely associated with variation in usage of pyrethroids for vector control. Resistance monitoring and management is recommended in light of the potential for arbovirus outbreaks in this state. Also, alternative approaches to mosquito control that do not involve insecticides should be explored.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsDrug ResistanceInsecticidesMosquito VectorsNew MexicoPyrethrinsInsecticidesPyrethrins

Identifiers

PMID30794644
PMCPMC6386485
OpenAlexW2917295659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.