Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794631›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Comparison of linear model and artificial neural network using antler beam diameter and length of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) dataset.

Sunday O Peters, Mahmut Sinecen, George R Gallagher, Lauren A Pebworth, Suleima Jacob, Jason S Hatfield, Kadir Kizilkaya

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sunday O PetersDepartment of Animal Science, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0216-926X
Mahmut SinecenDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.
George R GallagherDepartment of Animal Science, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, United States of America.
Lauren A PebworthDepartment of Animal Science, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, United States of America.
Suleima JacobDepartment of Animal Science, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, United States of America.
Jason S HatfieldDepartment of Animal Science, School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Berry College, Mount Berry, Georgia, United States of America.
Kadir KizilkayaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of harvest data remains one of the most important sources of information in the development of strategies to manage regional populations of white-tailed deer. While descriptive statistics and simple linear models are utilized extensively, the use of artificial neural networks for this type of data analyses is unexplored. Linear model was compared to Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) models with Levenberg-Marquardt (L-M), Bayesian Regularization (BR) and Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG) learning algorithms, to evaluate the relative accuracy in predicting antler beam diameter and length using age and dressed body weight in white-tailed deer. Data utilized for this study were obtained from male animals harvested by hunters between 1977-2009 at the Berry College Wildlife Management Area. Metrics for evaluating model performance indicated that linear and ANN models resulted in close match and good agreement between predicted and observed values and thus good performance for all models. However, metrics values of Mean Absolute Error and Root Mean Squared Error for linear model and the ANN-BR model indicated smaller error and lower deviation relative to the mean values of antler beam diameter and length in comparison to other ANN models, demonstrating better agreement of the predicted and observed values of antler beam diameter and length. ANN-SCG model resulted in the highest error within the models. Overall, metrics for evaluating model performance from the ANN model with BR learning algorithm and linear model indicated better agreement of the predicted and observed values of antler beam diameter and length. Results of this study suggest the use of ANN generated results that are comparable to Linear Models of harvest data to aid in the development of strategies to manage white-tailed deer.

Indexed as

AntlersDatabases, FactualDeerModels, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsMale

Identifiers

PMID30794631
PMCPMC6386314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.