Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794619›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Improving estimates of district HIV prevalence and burden in South Africa using small area estimation techniques.

Steve Gutreuter, Ehimario Igumbor, Njeri Wabiri, Mitesh Desai, Lizette Durand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Comparison of Bayesian Spatial Models for HIV Mapping in South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Small Area Estimation for Disease Prevalence Mapping.International statistical review = Revue internationale de statistique · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Steve GutreuterDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0733-2900
Ehimario IgumborDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Njeri WabiriDivision of Epidemiology and Strategic Information, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Mitesh DesaiDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Lizette DurandDivision of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USHuman Sciences Research Council · ZAUniversity of the Western Cape · ZA

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many countries, including South Africa, have implemented population-based household surveys to estimate HIV prevalence and the burden of HIV infection. Most household HIV surveys are designed to provide reliable estimates down to only the first subnational geopolitical level which, in South Africa, is composed of nine provinces. However HIV prevalence estimates are needed down to at least the second subnational level in order to better target the delivery of HIV care, treatment and prevention services. The second subnational level in South Africa is composed of 52 districts. Achieving adequate precision at the second subnational level therefore requires either a substantial increase in survey sample size or use of model-based estimation capable of incorporating other pre-existing data. Our purpose is demonstration of the efficacy of relatively simple small-area estimation of HIV prevalence in the 52 districts of South Africa using data from the South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behavior Survey, 2012, district-level HIV prevalence estimates obtained from testing of pregnant women who attended antenatal care (ANC) clinics in 2012, and 2012 demographic data. The best-fitting model included only ANC prevalence and dependency ratio as out-of-survey predictors. Our key finding is that ANC prevalence was the superior auxiliary covariate, and provided substantially improved precision in many district-level estimates of HIV prevalence in the general population. Inclusion of a district-level spatial simultaneously autoregressive covariance structure did not result in improved estimation.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleGeographyHealth SurveysHIV InfectionsHumansMaleModels, StatisticalPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal CarePrevalenceSentinel SurveillanceSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID30794619
PMCPMC6386240
OpenAlexW2915488224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.