Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794616›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Using natural language processing and machine learning to classify health literacy from secure messages: The ECLIPPSE study.

Renu Balyan, Scott A Crossley, William Brown, Andrew J Karter, Danielle S McNamara, Jennifer Y Liu, Courtney R Lyles, Dean Schillinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Renu BalyanIra A. Fulton School of Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1393-2416
Scott A CrossleyDepartment of Applied Linguistics/ESL, College of Arts and Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
William BrownUCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Andrew J KarterDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America.
Danielle S McNamaraPsychology Department, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Jennifer Y LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9702-7415
Courtney R LylesUCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Dean SchillingerUCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7221-7327

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes ComplicationsR01DK065664 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KARTER, ANDREW JOHN · 2004 to 2008
$3.3M
The Next Frontier in Diabetes Communication: Promoting Health Literacy in the Era of Secure MessagingR01LM012355 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KARTER, ANDREW JOHN, SCHILLINGER, DEAN · 2015 to 2018
$2.8M
Educational Disparities in Diabetes ComplicationsR01HD046113 · NICHD · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KARTER, ANDREW JOHN · 2003 to 2006
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046113NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK065664NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited health literacy is a barrier to optimal healthcare delivery and outcomes. Current measures requiring patients to self-report limitations are time-consuming and may be considered intrusive by some. This makes widespread classification of patient health literacy challenging. The objective of this study was to develop and validate "literacy profiles" as automated indicators of patients' health literacy to facilitate a non-intrusive, economic and more comprehensive characterization of health literacy among a health care delivery system's membership. To this end, three literacy profiles were generated based on natural language processing (combining computational linguistics and machine learning) using a sample of 283,216 secure messages sent from 6,941 patients to their primary care physicians. All patients were participants in Kaiser Permanente Northern California's DISTANCE Study. Performance of the three literacy profiles were compared against a gold standard of patient self-reported health literacy. Associations were analyzed between each literacy profile and patient demographics, health outcomes and healthcare utilization. T-tests were used for numeric data such as A1C, Charlson comorbidity index and healthcare utilization rates, and chi-square tests for categorical data such as sex, race, poor adherence and severe hypoglycemia. Literacy profiles varied in their test characteristics, with C-statistics ranging from 0.61-0.74. Relations between literacy profiles and health outcomes revealed patterns consistent with previous health literacy research: patients identified via literacy profiles indicative of limited health literacy: (a) were older and more likely of minority status; (b) had poorer medication adherence and glycemic control; and (c) exhibited higher rates of hypoglycemia, comorbidities and healthcare utilization. This represents the first successful attempt to employ natural language processing to estimate health literacy. Literacy profiles can offer an automated and economical way to identify patients with limited health literacy and greater vulnerability to poor health outcomes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNatural Language ProcessingCaliforniaComputer SecurityData MiningDemographyDiabetes MellitusElectronic MailFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, Primary Care

Identifiers

PMID30794616
PMCPMC6386302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.