SynthesisPloS one2019
CRISPR-cas gene-editing as plausible treatment of neuromuscular and nucleotide-repeat-expansion diseases: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Specific Biomarkers in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: A Systematic Review of Their Potential Uses in Disease Staging and Treatment Assessment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- A review of recent studies on CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in a variety of muscle-related genetic disorders.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Transcriptome analyses of human corneal endothelial cell lines derived from patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CRISPR in Neurodegenerative Diseases Treatment: An Alternative Approach to Current Therapies.Genes · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Delivery Enhanced by Lipo-Xenopeptide Carriers and Homology-Directed Repair Modulators: Insights from Reporter Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- CRISPR-Cas Systems: A Functional Perspective and Innovations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Gene Editing for Plant Resistance to Abiotic Factors: A Systematic Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A 20-year bibliometric analysis of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: from 2001 to 2020.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Current and emerging treatment modalities for spinocerebellar ataxias.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2022Review
- Exploring nano-enabled CRISPR-Cas-powered strategies for efficient diagnostics and treatment of infectious diseases.Journal of nanostructure in chemistry · 2022Review
- Recent advances in lentiviral vectors for gene therapy.Science China. Life sciences · 2021Review
- Dystrophin gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 system in human skeletal muscle cell line (HSkMC).Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021Article
- Small nucleic acids and the path to the clinic for anti-CRISPR.Biochemical pharmacology · 2021Review
- Cell and Gene Therapy for Anemia: Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Gene Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Therapeutic Genome Editing and In Vivo Delivery.The AAPS journal · 2021Review
- Quantitative muscle MRI as a sensitive marker of early muscle pathology in myotonic dystrophy type 1.Muscle & nerve · 2021Article
- TCF4-mediated Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: Insights into a common trinucleotide repeat-associated disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021Review
- Review
- A slipped-CAG DNA-binding small molecule induces trinucleotide-repeat contractions in vivo.Nature genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe system of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated proteins (cas) is a new technology that allows easier manipulation of the genome. Its potential to edit genes opened a new door in treatment development for incurable neurological monogenic diseases (NMGDs). The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the findings on the current development of CRISPR-cas for therapeutic purposes in the most frequent NMGDs and provide critical assessment. METHODS AND DATA ACQUISITION: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, looking for original studies on the use of CRISPR-cas to edit pathogenic variants in models of the most frequent NMGDs, until end of 2017. We included all the studies that met the following criteria: 1. Peer-reviewed study report with explicitly described experimental designs; 2. In vitro, ex vivo, or in vivo study using human or other animal biological systems (including cells, tissues, organs, organisms); 3. focusing on CRISPR as the gene-editing method of choice; and 5. featured at least one NMGD.
resultsWe obtained 404 papers from MEDLINE and 513 from EMBASE. After removing the duplicates, we screened 490 papers by title and abstract and assessed them for eligibility. After reading 50 full-text papers, we finally selected 42 for the review. DISCUSSION: Here we give a systematic summary on the preclinical development of CRISPR-cas for therapeutic purposes in NMGDs. Furthermore, we address the clinical interpretability of the findings, giving a comprehensive overview of the current state of the art. Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD) paves the way forward, with 26 out of 42 studies reporting different strategies on DMD gene editing in different models of the disease. Most of the strategies aimed for permanent exon skipping by deletion with CRISPR-cas. Successful silencing of the mHTT gene with CRISPR-cas led to successful reversal of the neurotoxic effects in the striatum of mouse models of Huntington's disease. Many other strategies have been explored, including epigenetic regulation of gene expression, in cellular and animal models of: myotonic dystrophy, Fraxile X syndrome, ataxias, and other less frequent dystrophies. Still, before even considering the clinical application of CRISPR-cas, three major bottlenecks need to be addressed: efficacy, safety, and delivery of the systems. This requires a collaborative approach in the research community, while having ethical considerations in mind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.