Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794570›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

How people living with diabetes in Indonesia learn about their disease: A grounded theory study.

Titan Ligita, Kristin Wicking, Karen Francis, Nichole Harvey, Intansari Nurjannah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The standardizedHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  14. What I felt as a diabetes fatigue survivor: a phenomenology study.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Detection of Hemostasis Abnormalities in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Thromboelastography.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Titan LigitaNursing, Midwifery and Nutrition, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0884-2221
Kristin WickingNursing, Midwifery and Nutrition, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5996-6518
Karen FrancisNursing, Midwifery and Nutrition, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3578-2498
Nichole HarveyMedicine, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Intansari NurjannahNursing, Midwifery and Nutrition, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes education has been found to impact positively on self-management by people with diabetes although little is known about the process by which they assimilate information. The aim of this study was to generate a theory explaining the process by which people with diabetes learn about their disease in Indonesia.

methodsThis study employed a grounded theory methodology influenced by constructivism and symbolic interactionism. A total of twenty-eight face-to-face or telephone interviews with participants from Indonesia that included people with diabetes, healthcare professionals, health service providers and families of people with diabetes were conducted in both Indonesia and Australia.

resultsThis study discloses a core category of Learning, choosing, and acting: self-management of diabetes in Indonesia as the basic social process of how people learn about their diabetes. The process includes five distinctive major categories. People with diabetes acted after they had received recommendations that they considered to be trustworthy. Factors that influenced their choice of recommendations to adopt are also identified.

conclusionsAwareness of the complexity involved in their decision making will assist healthcare professionals to engage effectively with people living with diabetes.

Indexed as

Grounded TheoryDecision MakingDiabetes MellitusFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndonesiaMalePatient Education as TopicSelf-ManagementTrust

Identifiers

PMID30794570
PMCPMC6386238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.