ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Structure and variability of delay activity in premotor cortex.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preparatory encoding of intended movement in the human motor cortex and implications for brain-computer interfaces.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Sparse component analysis: A method that uncovers separable computations within neural population activity.Neuron · 2026Article
- Premotor cortex uses a compositional neural geometry to plan words.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Beta-band desynchronization in the human hippocampus during movement preparation in a delayed reach task.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Reward influences movement vigor through multiple motor cortical mechanisms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- A neural basis of choking under pressure.Neuron · 2024Article
- Motor Cortex Latent Dynamics Encode Spatial and Temporal Arm Movement Parameters Independently.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Motor cortex latent dynamics encode spatial and temporal arm movement parameters independently.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A brain machine interface framework for exploring proactive control of smart environments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Identifying Interpretable Latent Factors with Sparse Component Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Methylphenidate modulates motor cortical dynamics and behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Computation Through Neural Population Dynamics.Annual review of neuroscience · 2020Review
- Article
- Temporal neural coupling: reconciling the Bobath concept with task-oriented training for post-stroke upper limb recovery-a perspective.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Voluntary movements are widely considered to be planned before they are executed. Recent studies have hypothesized that neural activity in motor cortex during preparation acts as an 'initial condition' which seeds the proceeding neural dynamics. Here, we studied these initial conditions in detail by investigating 1) the organization of neural states for different reaches and 2) the variance of these neural states from trial to trial. We examined population-level responses in macaque premotor cortex (PMd) during the preparatory stage of an instructed-delay center-out reaching task with dense target configurations. We found that after target onset the neural activity on single trials converges to neural states that have a clear low-dimensional structure which is organized by both the reach endpoint and maximum speed of the following reach. Further, we found that variability of the neural states during preparation resembles the spatial variability of reaches made in the absence of visual feedback: there is less variability in direction than distance in neural state space. We also used offline decoding to understand the implications of this neural population structure for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs). We found that decoding of angle between reaches is dependent on reach distance, while decoding of arc-length is independent. Thus, it might be more appropriate to quantify decoding performance for discrete BMIs by using arc-length between reach end-points rather than the angle between them. Lastly, we show that in contrast to the common notion that direction can better be decoded than distance, their decoding capabilities are comparable. These results provide new insights into the dynamical neural processes that underline motor control and can inform the design of BMIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.