Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794534›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Uncovering and resolving challenges of quantitative modeling in a simplified community of interacting cells.

Samuel F M Hart, Hanbing Mi, Robin Green, Li Xie, Jose Mario Bello Pineda, Babak Momeni, Wenying Shou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Physics-constrained neural ordinary differential equation models to discover and predict microbial community dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel F M HartDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5068-2199
Hanbing MiDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6078-6274
Robin GreenDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Li XieDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3397-2407
Jose Mario Bello PinedaDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1417-9200
Babak MomeniDepartment of Biology, Boston College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1271-5196
Wenying ShouDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5693-381X

Funding

University of Washington Medical Scientist Training Program: MD/PhDT32GM007266 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HORWITZ, MARSHALL S. · 1985 to 2023
$30.4M
Cellular Cooperation and Cheating: an Experimental and Mathematical AnalysisDP2OD006498 · OD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SHOU, WENYING · 2009 to 2009
$2.6M
Diversity Action Plan: UW GenOM ProjectR25HG007153 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EICHLER, EVAN · 2013 to 2020
$2.3M
Understanding Robustness of a Cooperative Microbial Community during EvolutionR01GM124128 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI XIE, LI · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R25 HG007153NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124128NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007266NIH HHS DP2 OD006498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative modeling is useful for predicting behaviors of a system and for rationally constructing or modifying the system. The predictive power of a model relies on accurate quantification of model parameters. Here, we illustrate challenges in parameter quantification and offer means to overcome these challenges, using a case example in which we quantitatively predict the growth rate of a cooperative community. Specifically, the community consists of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, each engineered to release a metabolite required and consumed by its partner. The initial model, employing parameters measured in batch monocultures with zero or excess metabolite, failed to quantitatively predict experimental results. To resolve the model-experiment discrepancy, we chemically identified the correct exchanged metabolites, but this did not improve model performance. We then remeasured strain phenotypes in chemostats mimicking the metabolite-limited community environments, while mitigating or incorporating effects of rapid evolution. Almost all phenotypes we measured, including death rate, metabolite release rate, and the amount of metabolite consumed per cell birth, varied significantly with the metabolite environment. Once we used parameters measured in a range of community-like chemostat environments, prediction quantitatively agreed with experimental results. In summary, using a simplified community, we uncovered and devised means to resolve modeling challenges that are likely general to living systems.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCoculture TechniquesComputer SimulationMetabolic EngineeringMicrobial InteractionsSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID30794534
PMCPMC6402699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.