ArticleBioconjugate chemistry2019
Interactions of an Anti-Sickling Drug with Hemoglobin in Red Blood Cells from a Patient with Sickle Cell Anemia.
Article in Bioconjugate chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Newer Modalities and Updates in the Management of Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of blood medicine · 2024Review
- Bach1 inhibitor HPP-D mediates γ-globin gene activation in sickle erythroid progenitors.Blood cells, molecules & diseases · 2024Article
- Functional foods: promising therapeutics for Nigerian Children with sickle cell diseases.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Article
- MWC allosteric model explains unusual hemoglobin-oxygen binding curves from sickle cell drug binding.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Research in Sickle Cell Disease: From Bedside to Bench to Bedside.HemaSphere · 2021Review
- Recent Advances in the Treatment of Sickle Cell Disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Discovery and Identification of Serum Succinyl-Proteome for Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis and Osteopenia.Orthopaedic surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The pathophysiology associated with sickle cell disease (SCD) includes hemolytic anemia, vaso-occlusive events, and ultimately end organ damage set off by the polymerization of deoxygenated hemoglobin S (HbS) into long fibers and sickling of red blood cells (RBCs). One approach toward mitigating HbS polymerization is to pharmacologically stabilize the oxygenated (R) conformation of HbS and thereby reduce sickling frequency and SCD pathology. GBT440 is an α-subunit-specific modifying agent that has recently been reported to increase HbS oxygen binding affinity and consequently delay in vitro polymerization. In addition, animal model studies have demonstrated the potential for GBT440 to be a suitable therapeutic for daily oral dosing in humans. Here, we report an optimized method for detecting GBT440 intermediates in human patient hemolysate using a combination of HPLC and mass spectrometry analysis. First, oxygen dissociation curves (ODCs) analyzed from patient blood showed that oxygen affinity increased in a dose dependent manner. Second, HPLC and integrated mass spectrometric analysis collectively confirmed that GBT440 labeling was specific to the α N-terminus thereby ruling out other potential ligand binding sites. Finally, the results from this optimized analytical approach allowed us to detect a stable α-specific GBT440 adduct in the patient's hemolysate in a dose dependent manner. The results and methods presented in this report could therefore potentially help therapeutic monitoring of GBT440 induced oxygen affinity and reveal critical insight into the biophysical properties of GBT440 Hb complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.