Trial reportJAMA2019
Effect of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Ingestion Among Children With Peanut Allergy: The PEPITES Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02636699 (A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Pivotal Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Peanut Epicutaneous Immunotherapy With Viaskin Peanut in Peanut-allergic Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 105 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Pivotal Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Peanut Epicutaneous Immunotherapy With Viaskin Peanut in Peanut-allergic Children
Who cites it
105 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.
- Re-evaluating treatment success in trials of peanut oral-immunotherapy: impact of different definitions on efficacy outcomes.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Epicutaneous immunotherapy for food allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- From Skin to Solution: Exploring Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Epithelial immunotherapy for food allergy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Allergen immunotherapy and/or biologicals for IgE-mediated food allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Allergy · 2022Pooled it
- Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021Pooled it
- The Effectiveness and Value of Oral Immunotherapy and Viaskin Peanut for Peanut Allergy.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Epicutaneous immunotherapy for treatment of peanut allergy: Follow-up from the Consortium for Food Allergy Research.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021Trial
- Expansion of the CD4The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2020Trial
- Development of a novel Ara h 2 hypoallergen with no IgE binding or anaphylactogenic activity.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2020Trial
- Long-term sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy in children: Clinical and immunologic evidence of desensitization.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2019Trial
- Nanomaterials for Allergy Diagnosis and Treatment: Advances, Opportunities and Translational Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Wheat Allergy: Clinical Phenotypes, Diagnostic Approaches, and Management Strategies.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Review
- Eating away at food allergy.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025Review
- Dendritic Cells: at the Crossroads between Oral Tolerance and Food Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Review
- Microneedles in Allergy Immunotherapy: the Present and Future.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Review
- Immunotherapy in Peanut Allergy: The Present and the Future.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Article
- Transdermal Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy Using a Biodegradable Microneedle Array Patch in a Murine Model of Peanut Anaphylaxis.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Article
- Novel approaches to prevent or cure allergic diseases.Current opinion in immunology · 2025Review
45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
33 authors at 20 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: There are currently no approved treatments for peanut allergy. Objective: To assess the efficacy and adverse events of epicutaneous immunotherapy with a peanut patch among peanut-allergic children. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 31 sites in 5 countries between January 8, 2016, and August 18, 2017. Participants included peanut-allergic children (aged 4-11 years [n = 356] without a history of a severe anaphylactic reaction) developing objective symptoms during a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge at an eliciting dose of 300 mg or less of peanut protein. Interventions: Daily treatment with peanut patch containing either 250 μg of peanut protein (n = 238) or placebo (n = 118) for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage difference in responders between the peanut patch and placebo patch based on eliciting dose (highest dose at which objective signs/symptoms of an immediate hypersensitivity reaction developed) determined by food challenges at baseline and month 12. Participants with baseline eliciting dose of 10 mg or less were responders if the posttreatment eliciting dose was 300 mg or more; participants with baseline eliciting dose greater than 10 to 300 mg were responders if the posttreatment eliciting dose was 1000 mg or more. A threshold of 15% or more on the lower bound of a 95% CI around responder rate difference was prespecified to determine a positive trial result. Adverse event evaluation included collection of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Among 356 participants randomized (median age, 7 years; 61.2% male), 89.9% completed the trial; the mean treatment adherence was 98.5%. The responder rate was 35.3% with peanut-patch treatment vs 13.6% with placebo (difference, 21.7% [95% CI, 12.4%-29.8%; P < .001]). The prespecified lower bound of the CI threshold was not met. TEAEs, primarily patch application site reactions, occurred in 95.4% and 89% of active and placebo groups, respectively. The all-causes rate of discontinuation was 10.5% in the peanut-patch group vs 9.3% in the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among peanut-allergic children aged 4 to 11 years, the percentage difference in responders at 12 months with the 250-μg peanut-patch therapy vs placebo was 21.7% and was statistically significant, but did not meet the prespecified lower bound of the confidence interval criterion for a positive trial result. The clinical relevance of not meeting this lower bound of the confidence interval with respect to the treatment of peanut-allergic children with epicutaneous immunotherapy remains to be determined. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02636699.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.