Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794314›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2019

Effect of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Ingestion Among Children With Peanut Allergy: The PEPITES Randomized Clinical Trial.

David M Fleischer, Matthew Greenhawt, Gordon Sussman, Philippe Bégin, Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn, Daniel Petroni, Kirsten Beyer, Terri Brown-Whitehorn, Jacques Hebert, Jonathan O'B Hourihane and 23 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02636699 (A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Pivotal Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Peanut Epicutaneous Immunotherapy With Viaskin Peanut in Peanut-allergic Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 105 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
21.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02636699 phase3completednot on this map

A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Pivotal Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Peanut Epicutaneous Immunotherapy With Viaskin Peanut in Peanut-allergic Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorDBV TechnologiesRan2015 to 2017Enrolled500ConditionsPeanut AllergyArmsViaskin Peanut 250mcg, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Expansion of the CD4The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2020
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Eating away at food allergy.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Microneedles in Allergy Immunotherapy: the Present and Future.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  18. Immunotherapy in Peanut Allergy: The Present and the Future.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Novel approaches to prevent or cure allergic diseases.Current opinion in immunology · 2025
    Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 20 institutions in 6 countries.

David M FleischerChildren's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora.
Matthew GreenhawtChildren's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora.
Gordon SussmanGordon Sussman Clinical Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Philippe BéginCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anna Nowak-WegrzynIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Daniel PetroniNorthwest Allergy and Asthma Center, University of Washington Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle.
Kirsten BeyerCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Terri Brown-WhitehornChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jacques HebertClinique Spécialisée en Allergie de la Capital, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Jonathan O'B HourihanePaediatrics and Child Health, INFANT Centre and HRB-Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Dianne E CampbellChildren's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Stephanie LeonardUniversity of California, San Diego, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego.
R Sharon ChinthrajahSean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Jacqueline A PongracicAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Stacie M JonesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock.
Lars LangeSt Marien Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hey ChongChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Todd D GreenChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert WoodJohns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Amarjit CheemaCheema Research Inc, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Susan L PrescottDivision of Paediatrics, University of Western Australia School of Medicine, Perth, Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Australia.
Peter SmithAllergy Medical Group, Southport, Australia.
William YangOttawa Allergy Research Corporation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Edmond S ChanBritish Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Aideen ByrneOur Lady's Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Amal Assa'adCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Andrew BirdUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Edwin H KimUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Lynda SchneiderBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Carla M DavisBaylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
Bruce J LanserNational Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado.
Romain LambertDBV Technologies, Montrouge, France.
Wayne ShrefflerMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Children's Hospital Colorado · USDBV Technologies (France) · FRBaylor College of Medicine · USBoston Children's Hospital · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CACharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USLurie Children's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Jewish Health · USOttawa Allergy Research Corporation · CAOur Lady's Hospital · IEResearch Canada · CAStanford University · USSt. Marien-Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There are currently no approved treatments for peanut allergy. Objective: To assess the efficacy and adverse events of epicutaneous immunotherapy with a peanut patch among peanut-allergic children. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 31 sites in 5 countries between January 8, 2016, and August 18, 2017. Participants included peanut-allergic children (aged 4-11 years [n = 356] without a history of a severe anaphylactic reaction) developing objective symptoms during a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge at an eliciting dose of 300 mg or less of peanut protein. Interventions: Daily treatment with peanut patch containing either 250 μg of peanut protein (n = 238) or placebo (n = 118) for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage difference in responders between the peanut patch and placebo patch based on eliciting dose (highest dose at which objective signs/symptoms of an immediate hypersensitivity reaction developed) determined by food challenges at baseline and month 12. Participants with baseline eliciting dose of 10 mg or less were responders if the posttreatment eliciting dose was 300 mg or more; participants with baseline eliciting dose greater than 10 to 300 mg were responders if the posttreatment eliciting dose was 1000 mg or more. A threshold of 15% or more on the lower bound of a 95% CI around responder rate difference was prespecified to determine a positive trial result. Adverse event evaluation included collection of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Among 356 participants randomized (median age, 7 years; 61.2% male), 89.9% completed the trial; the mean treatment adherence was 98.5%. The responder rate was 35.3% with peanut-patch treatment vs 13.6% with placebo (difference, 21.7% [95% CI, 12.4%-29.8%; P < .001]). The prespecified lower bound of the CI threshold was not met. TEAEs, primarily patch application site reactions, occurred in 95.4% and 89% of active and placebo groups, respectively. The all-causes rate of discontinuation was 10.5% in the peanut-patch group vs 9.3% in the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among peanut-allergic children aged 4 to 11 years, the percentage difference in responders at 12 months with the 250-μg peanut-patch therapy vs placebo was 21.7% and was statistically significant, but did not meet the prespecified lower bound of the confidence interval criterion for a positive trial result. The clinical relevance of not meeting this lower bound of the confidence interval with respect to the treatment of peanut-allergic children with epicutaneous immunotherapy remains to be determined. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02636699.

Indexed as

Transdermal PatchAdministration, CutaneousAllergensArachisChildChild, PreschoolConfidence IntervalsDesensitization, ImmunologicDouble-Blind MethodEatingFemaleHumansMalePeanut HypersensitivityTreatment OutcomeAllergens

Identifiers

PMID30794314
PMCPMC6439674
OpenAlexW2916224422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.