ArticleLa Medicina del lavoro2019
Article in La Medicina del lavoro, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The psychological impact of asbestos exposure: risk perception and emotional distress among former workers in Tuscany.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Clinical investigation of former workers exposed to asbestos: the health surveillance experience of an Italian University Hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2016 the Administration of the Tuscany Region, Italy, established a health surveillance programme for workers with past asbestos exposure. The programme includes two levels of activities, a local basic health evaluation, and a centralized in-depth evaluation of specific cases.
objectivesTo estimate the number and identify the workers with past exposure to asbestos in Tuscan industrial settings entitled to participate in the health surveillance programme.
methodsThe number of formerly-exposed workers was estimated from the records of the working population of 15,441 workers of thirteen Tuscan asbestos industrial plants and from the existing data bases of the Local Health Administrations (USLs) and the Institute for Study, Prevention and Cancer Network (ISPRO), and from national data bases such as Social Security Administration (INPS) and National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL). The expected number of medical examinations per year was estimated from the adhesion rates seen in previous comparable programmes.
resultsThe estimated number of workers with past asbestos exposure eligible to the programme was 5,446. The estimated number of health examinations in the first and second phases of the surveillance programme during 2016-24 was 7,275 and 7,155, respectively, follow-up examinations included. The number of workers identified from local data bases was 4,713: They had been operating in 129 plants that had been using asbestos in the past. Further 1,395 workers were identified from previous health surveillance activities.
conclusionsThe use of several sources of information and the cooperation between occupational health services made it possible to identify a high proportion of former asbestos workers and plants., It is, nevertheless, still necessary to complete the list of eligible workers, and to facilitate their participation by making the programme more widely known.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.