Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794242›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2018

Are Sonication Cultures of Antibiotic Cement Spacers Useful During Second-stage Reimplantation Surgery for Prosthetic Joint Infection?

Adam S Olsen, Alan Wilson, Michael J OʼMalley, Kenneth L Urish, Brian A Klatt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Risk of reinfection after two- or multiple-stage knee revision surgery using superficial vancomycin coating and conventional spacers.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam S OlsenUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alan Wilson
Michael J OʼMalley
Kenneth L Urish
Brian A Klatt
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrganisms may persist on polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer surfaces, and subclinical infection is postulated to be a source of infection recurrence. Several small patient series have shown a high proportion of positive sonication cultures on PMMA spacers at the second stage of a two-stage revision. However, the association between a positive sonication culture and the risk for recurrence of infection after two-stage exchange is not fully elucidated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Are cultures derived from sonication of antibiotic spacers associated with infection control or recurrence after two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection (PJI)?

methodsBetween September 2013 and April 2016, we treated 67 patients with PJI with two-stage revisions. At the second stage, all cement spacers were explanted and sonicated. A total of`10 (15%) patients were lost to followup or failed to reach 1-year followup during the study period, and another 16 (24%) were excluded for prespecified reasons, leaving 41 patients for analysis in this study. Of the 41 patients included in this study, there were 25 TKAs, 15 THAs, and one distal femoral replacement. All patients met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI at Stage 1 of the two-stage revision. The most common infecting organisms prompting two-stage revision were methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. PMMA spacers were most frequently loaded with gentamicin or gentamicin/vancomycin. Standard 6-week intravenous antibiotic courses were used for index infections and postreimplantation suppression was used for 3 months in all patients as determined by cultures and sensitivities. Patients were assessed for recurrence of infection at postoperative clinic visits completed at standard intervals. The average length of followup was 1.9 years with a range of 1 to 3.3 years.

resultsSonication cultures that reached a threshold of 5 colony-forming units for positive culture had poor screening utility for subclinical persistent infection (sensitivity: 0%; confidence interval [CI], 0%-60%), but reasonable use for ruling in successful two-stage revision (specificity: 95%; 95% CI, 82%-99%). Positive sonication culture results in the two of 41 (4.9%) explanted spacers yielded coagulase-negative staphylococci, different from primary prosthesis cultures in both patients (Corynebacterium and Proteus mirabilis), and did not alter antibiotic choice. Neither of the patients has developed a reinfection at followup of 1.2 and 1.9 years. Of the 39 two-stage revisions with negative spacer sonication cultures, four developed reinfections.

conclusionsPositive sonication fluid culture of PMMA spacers during reimplantation surgery was not associated with persistent or recurrent infection at minimum followup of 1 year. We do not recommend routine sonication of explanted PMMA spacers in the absence of clinical evidence suggesting persistent infection. Multicenter, prospective studies with long-term followup are needed to determine if sonication of PMMA spacers can predict persistent or recurrent infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDevice RemovalSonicationAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHip ProsthesisHumansKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProsthesis DesignAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoated Materials, Biocompatible

Identifiers

PMID30794242
PMCPMC6259822
OpenAlexW2811388010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.