Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794202›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Empowering Young People Living With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis to Better Communicate With Families and Care Teams: Content Analysis of Semistructured Interviews.

Stuart W Grande, Meghan R Longacre, Karin Palmblad, Meera V Montan, Rikard P Berquist, Andreas Hager, Greg Kotzbauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A rocky road but worth the drive: A longitudinal qualitative study of patient innovators and researchers cocreating research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stuart W GrandeDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6796-7991
Meghan R Longacre *Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8230-1741
Karin PalmbladKarolinska Institutet, Department of Women and Child Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1197-5201
Meera V MontanUpstream Dream, Bromma, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8818-6142
Rikard P BerquistUpstream Dream, Bromma, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-0191
Andreas HagerUpstream Dream, Bromma, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4748-1986
Greg KotzbauerDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4980-550X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung people living with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) face a number of communication barriers for achieving optimal health as they transition from pediatric care into adult care. Despite growing interest in mobile or wireless technologies to support health (mHealth), it is uncertain how these engagement tools might support young people, their families, and care teams to optimize preference-based treatment strategies.

objectiveThis study aims to examine how an mHealth patient support system (mPSS) might foster partnership between young people living with JIA, their families, and care teams.

methodsSemistructured interviews with young people (5-15 years old), their families, and JIA care teams were conducted using researcher-developed interviews guides. Transcribed data were qualitatively analyzed using conventional content analysis.

resultsWe conducted semistructured interviews with 15 young people, their parents, and 4 care team members. Content analysis revealed the potential of an mPSS to support productive dialogue between families and care teams. We identified four main themes: (1) young people with JIA face communication challenges, (2) normalizing illness through shared experience may improve adherence, (3) partnership opens windows into illness experiences, and (4) readiness to engage appears critical for clinic implementation.

conclusionsA human-centered mPSS design that offers JIA patients the ability to track personally relevant illness concerns and needs can enhance communication, generate consensus-based treatment decisions, and improve efficiency and personalization of care. Technology that supports continuous learning and promotes better understanding of disease management may reduce practice burden while increasing patient engagement and autonomy in fostering lasting treatment decisions and ultimately supporting personalized care and improving outcomes.

Indexed as

CommunicationProfessional-Patient RelationsAdolescentArthritis, JuvenileChildChild, PreschoolFamilyFamily RelationsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient Care TeamSwedenhealth communicationinterviewsjuvenile arthritispatient participation

Identifiers

PMID30794202
PMCPMC6406228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.