Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30794092›Full record

ArticlemAbs2019

Physicochemical and functional assessments demonstrating analytical similarity between rituximab biosimilar HLX01 and the MabThera®.

Yanpeng Xu, Liqi Xie, Erhui Zhang, Wenyuan Gao, Linlin Wang, Yang Cao, Michael Hongwei Xie, Weidong Jiang, Scott Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Demonstrating Analytical Similarity of Trastuzumab Biosimilar HLX02 to HerceptinBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yanpeng Xua Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc ., Shanghai , China.
Liqi Xiea Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc ., Shanghai , China.ORCID 0000-0002-5207-8278
Erhui Zhanga Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc ., Shanghai , China.ORCID 0000-0002-8641-3855
Wenyuan Gaoa Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc ., Shanghai , China.
Linlin Wanga Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc ., Shanghai , China.ORCID 0000-0002-6265-4849
Yang Caoa Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc ., Shanghai , China.
Michael Hongwei Xiea Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc ., Shanghai , China.
Weidong Jianga Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc ., Shanghai , China.
Scott Liua Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc ., Shanghai , China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of bio-therapeutics has exhibited exponential growth in China over the past decade. However, no biosimilar drug has been approved in China (CN) due to the lack of a national biosimilar regulatory guidance. HLX01, a rituximab biosimilar developed in China under European Medicines Agency biosimilar guidelines and requirements, was the first such drug submitted for regulatory review in China, and it is expected to receive approval there as a biosimilar product. To demonstrate the analytical similarities of HLX01, CN-rituximab (sourced in China but manufactured in Europe) and EU-rituximab (sourced and manufactured in Europe), an extensive 3-way physicochemical and functional similarity assessment using a series of orthogonal and state-of-the-art techniques was conducted, following the similarity requirement guidelines recently published by China's Center for Drug Evaluation. The results of the similarity study showed an identical protein amino acid sequence and highly similar primary structures between HLX01 and the reference product (RP) MabThera®, along with high similarities in higher order structures, potency, integrity, purity and impurity profiles, biological and immunological binding functions, as well as degradation behaviors under stress conditions. In addition, HLX01 presented slightly lower aggregates and better photostability compared with the RP. Despite slight changes in relative abundance of glycan moieties and heavy chain C-terminal lysine modification, no differences in biological activities and immunological properties were observed between the RP and HLX01. In conclusion, HLX01 is highly similar to CN- and EU-sourced RP in terms of physicochemical properties and biological activities, suggesting similar product quality, efficacy, and safety. The regulatory requirements interpreted and applied towards the HLX01 marketing application sets a precedent for analytical similarity assessment of biosimilar products in China.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceSequence Analysis, ProteinBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsHumansRituximabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsRituximabAnalytical similaritybiosimilar mAbChina biosimilar regulatoryfunctional assessmentLC-MS characterizationphysicochemical assessment

Identifiers

PMID30794092
PMCPMC6512903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.