Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30793747›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2019

Rifampicin and rifabutin resistance in 1003 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates.

Maha R Farhat, Jaimie Sixsmith, Roger Calderon, Nathan D Hicks, Sarah M Fortune, Megan Murray

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differential Impact of theMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Tuberculosis Pathways to Care and Transmission of Multidrug Resistance in India.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maha R FarhatDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, USA.
Jaimie SixsmithDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.
Roger CalderonSocios en Salud, Calle Los Geranios 312, Lince, Peru.
Nathan D HicksDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.
Sarah M FortuneDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.
Megan MurrayDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USEsSALUD · PE

Funding

Sequencing CoreU19AI109755 · NIAID · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI CHANDLER, DARRELL P, CULHANE, AEDIN C · 2014 to 2018
$29.1M
New Tools for the interpretation of Pathogen Genomic Data with a focus on Mycobacterium tuberculosisK01ES026835 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FARHAT, MAHA · 2015 to 2019
$1.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI109755NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES026835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDrug-resistant TB remains a public health challenge. Rifamycins are among the most potent anti-TB drugs. They are known to target the RpoB subunit of RNA polymerase; however, our understanding of how rifamycin resistance is genetically encoded remains incomplete. Here we investigated rpoB genetic diversity and cross-resistance between the two rifamycin drugs rifampicin and rifabutin.

methodsWe performed WGS of 1003 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates and determined MICs of both rifamycin agents on 7H10 agar using the indirect proportion method. We generated rpoB mutants in a laboratory strain and measured their antibiotic susceptibility using the alamarBlue reduction assay.

resultsOf the 1003 isolates, 766 were rifampicin resistant and 210 (27%) of these were rifabutin susceptible; 102/210 isolates had the rpoB mutation D435V (Escherichia coli D516V). Isolates with discordant resistance were 17.2 times more likely to harbour a D435V mutation than those resistant to both agents (OR 17.2, 95% CI 10.5-27.9, P value <10-40). Compared with WT, the D435V in vitro mutant had an increased IC50 of both rifamycins; however, in both cases to a lesser degree than the S450L (E. coli S531L) mutation.

conclusionsThe observation that the rpoB D435V mutation produces an increase in the IC50 of both drugs contrasts with findings from previous smaller studies that suggested that isolates with the D435V mutation remain rifabutin susceptible despite being rifampicin resistant. Our finding thus suggests that the recommended critical testing concentration for rifabutin should be revised.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisRifabutinRifampinTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsRifabutinRifampin

Identifiers

PMID30793747
PMCPMC6524487
OpenAlexW2918154604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.