Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30793697›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2019

Effect of Supportive Supervision on Performance of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests in Sub-Saharan Africa.

M James Eliades, Jolene Wun, Sarah M Burnett, Fozo Alombah, Felicia Amoo-Sakyi, Petros Chirambo, Goodluck Tesha, Kelly M Davis, Paul Hamilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of Supportive Supervision on Malaria Microscopy Competencies in Sub-Saharan Africa.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M James EliadesPopulation and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Jolene WunPresident's Malaria Initiative (PMI) MalariaCare Project, PATH, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sarah M BurnettPresident's Malaria Initiative (PMI) MalariaCare Project, PATH, Washington, District of Columbia.
Fozo AlombahPresident's Malaria Initiative (PMI) MalariaCare Project, PATH, Washington, District of Columbia.
Felicia Amoo-SakyiPresident's Malaria Initiative (PMI) MalariaCare Project, PATH, Accra, Ghana.
Petros ChiramboPresident's Malaria Initiative (PMI) MalariaCare Project, Medical Care Development International, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Goodluck TeshaPresident's Malaria Initiative (PMI) MalariaCare Project, PATH, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Kelly M DavisPresident's Malaria Initiative (PMI) MalariaCare Project, PATH, Washington, District of Columbia.
Paul HamiltonPresident's Malaria Initiative (PMI) MalariaCare Project, PATH, Washington, District of Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are one of the primary tools used for parasitological confirmation of suspected cases of malaria. To ensure accurate results, health-care workers (HCWs) must conduct the RDT test correctly. Trained supervisors visited 3,603 facilities to assess RDT testing performance and conduct outreach training and supportive supervision activities in eight African countries between 2015 and 2017, using a 12-point checklist to determine if key steps were being performed. The proportion of HCWs performing each step correctly improved between 1.1 and 21.0 percentage points between the first and third visits. Health-care worker scores were averaged to calculate facility scores, which were found to be high: the average score across all facilities was 85% during the first visit and increased to 91% during the third visit. A regression analysis of these facility scores estimated that, holding key facility factors equal, facility performance improved by 5.3 percentage points from the first to the second visit (

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesProfessional CompetenceAfrica South of the SaharaHealth FacilitiesHealth PersonnelHumansMalariaOrganization and AdministrationRegression AnalysisReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID30793697
PMCPMC6447133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.