Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30793687›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2019

Improving Sanitation and Hygiene through Community-Led Total Sanitation: The Zambian Experience.

Kojo Yeboah-Antwi, William B MacLeod, Godfrey Biemba, Patrick Sijenyi, Alexandra Höhne, Lavuun Verstraete, Caitryn M McCallum, Davidson H Hamer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Understanding Open Defecation in the Age ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Community-Led Total Sanitation Moves the Needle on Ending Open Defecation in Zambia.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kojo Yeboah-AntwiDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
William B MacLeodDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Godfrey BiembaNational Health Research Authority, Lusaka, Zambia.
Patrick SijenyiWater, Sanitation and Hygiene Section, United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Alexandra HöhneWater, Sanitation and Hygiene Section, United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lavuun VerstraeteWater, Sanitation and Hygiene Section, United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Caitryn M McCallumDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Davidson H HamerDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2012, approximately 5.6 million Zambians did not have access to improved sanitation and around 2.1 million practiced open defecation. The Zambia Sanitation and Hygiene Program (ZSHP), featuring community-led total sanitation, began in November 2011 to increase the use of improved sanitation facilities and adopt positive hygiene practices. Using a pre- and post-design approach with a population-level survey, after 3 years of implementation, we evaluated the impact of ZSHP in randomly selected households in 50 standard enumeration areas (representing 26 of 65 program districts). We interviewed caregivers of children younger than 5 years old (1,204 and 1,170 female caregivers at baseline and end line, respectively) and inspected household toilet facilities and sites for washing hands. At end line, 80% of households had access to improved sanitation facilities versus 64.1% at baseline (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.18-1.31) and 14.1% did not have a toilet facility compared with 19.4% at baseline. At end line, 10.6% of households reported living in an open defecation-free certified village compared with 0.3% at baseline (PR = 32.0; 95% CI: 11.9-86.4). In addition, at end line, 33.4% of households had a specific place for washing hands and 61.4% of caregivers reported handwashing with a washing agent after defecation or before preparing food compared with 21.1% (PR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.39-1.82) and 55.2% (PR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.04-1.19) at baseline, respectively. Community-led total sanitation implementation in Zambia led to improvements in access to improved sanitation facilities, reduced open defecation, and better handwashing practices. There is however a need for enhanced investment in sanitation and hygiene promotion.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationAdultCaregiversChild, PreschoolDefecationDiarrheaFemaleHumansHygieneInfantMalePrevalenceRural PopulationSanitationToilet FacilitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30793687
PMCPMC6447113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.