ArticlePediatric transplantation2019
Expanding analytic possibilities in pediatric solid organ transplantation through linkage of administrative and clinical registry databases.
Article in Pediatric transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hospitalization Costs of Kidney Transplantation Associated With Induction Therapy Among Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: A North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies and Pediatric Health Information System Collaborative Study.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Article
- The influence of neighborhood income on healthcare utilization in pediatric liver transplant.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2024Article
- Outcomes based on induction regimens in pediatric kidney transplantation: a NAPRTCS and PHIS collaborative study.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of liver transplantation in biliary atresia according to the severity of end-stage liver disease.BMC pediatrics · 2023Article
- Time Trends in Clinical Characteristics and Hospital Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Lung Transplantation in COPD Patients in Spain from 2016 to 2020-Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Center Variation in Indication and Short-Term Outcomes after Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Analysis of a Merged United Network for Organ Sharing - Pediatric Health Information System Cohort.Pediatric cardiology · 2022Article
- Leveraging big data to advance knowledge in pediatric heart failure and heart transplantation.Translational pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Database linkage is a common strategy to expand analytic possibilities. Our group recently completed a linkage between the SRTR and PHIS databases for pediatric heart transplant recipients. The aim of this project was to expand the linkage between SRTR and PHIS to include liver, kidney, lung, heart-lung, and small bowel transplants. All patients (<21 years) who underwent liver, kidney, lung, heart-lung, or small bowel transplant were identified from the PHIS database using APR-DRG codes (2002-2018). Linkage was performed in a stepwise approach using indirect identifiers. Hospital costs were estimated based on hospital charges and cost-to-charge ratios, inflated to 2018 dollars and described by transplant type. A total of 14 061 patients overlapped between databases. Of these, 13 388 (95.2%) were uniquely linked. Linkage success ranged from 92.6% to 97.8% by organ system. A total of 12 940 (92%) patients had complete cost data. Hospitalization costs were greatest for patients undergoing small bowel transplantation with a median cost of $734 454 (IQR $336 174 - $1 504 167), followed by heart $565 386 (IQR $352 813 - $999 216), heart-lung $471 573 (IQR $328 523 - 992 438), lung $303 536 (IQR $215 383 - $612 749), liver $200 448 (IQR $130 880 - $357 897), and kidney transplant $94 796 (IQR $73 157 -$131 040). We report a robust linkage between the SRTR and PHIS databases, providing an invaluable tool to assess resource utilization in solid organ transplant recipients. Our analysis provides contemporary cost data for pediatric solid organ transplantation from the largest US sample reported to date. It also provides a platform for expanded analyses in the pediatric transplant population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.