Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30793292›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2019

Individual- versus group-optimality in the production of secreted bacterial compounds.

Konstanze T Schiessl, Adin Ross-Gillespie, Daniel M Cornforth, Michael Weigert, Colette Bigosch, Sam P Brown, Martin Ackermann, Rolf Kümmerli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Antibiotic production inScience advances · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Konstanze T SchiesslDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf, 8600, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1053-5610
Adin Ross-GillespieDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zürich, Zürich, 8057, Switzerland.
Daniel M CornforthSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 30332, Georgia.
Michael WeigertDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zürich, Zürich, 8057, Switzerland.
Colette BigoschDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), Zürich, 8092, Switzerland.
Sam P BrownSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 30332, Georgia.
Martin AckermannDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf, 8600, Switzerland.
Rolf KümmerliDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zürich, Zürich, 8057, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4084-6679
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 681295Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PP00P3-139164Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PP2EZP3-162260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How unicellular organisms optimize the production of compounds is a fundamental biological question. While it is typically thought that production is optimized at the individual-cell level, secreted compounds could also allow for optimization at the group level, leading to a division of labor where a subset of cells produces and shares the compound with everyone. Using mathematical modeling, we show that the evolution of such division of labor depends on the cost function of compound production. Specifically, for any trait with saturating benefits, linear costs promote the evolution of uniform production levels across cells. Conversely, production costs that diminish with higher output levels favor the evolution of specialization-especially when compound shareability is high. When experimentally testing these predictions with pyoverdine, a secreted iron-scavenging compound produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we found linear costs and, consistent with our model, detected uniform pyoverdine production levels across cells. We conclude that for shared compounds with saturating benefits, the evolution of division of labor is facilitated by a diminishing cost function. More generally, we note that shifts in the level of selection from individuals to groups do not solely require cooperation, but critically depend on mechanistic factors, including the distribution of compound synthesis costs.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticBiological EvolutionOligopeptidesPseudomonas aeruginosaSiderophoresOligopeptidespyoverdinSiderophoresBacteriadivision of laboreconomy of scalesgroup level selectionoptimal productionsiderophores

Identifiers

PMID30793292
PMCPMC6467250
OpenAlexW2951218863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.