ArticleChemical communications (Cambridge, England)2019
Efficient synthesis of carbon-11 labelled acylsulfonamides using [
Article in Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reactive Palladium-Ligand Complexes forPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herein, a novel method for carbon-11 labeling of acyl sulfonamides by a one-step insertive [11C]CO carbonylative cross-coupling reaction between aryl halides and sulfonamides is presented. Various model compounds as well as drug molecules LY573636 (tasisulam) and ABT-199 were obtained in excellent yields. This method provides a valuable and widely applicable contribution to the continuously expanding radiochemical toolbox for PET research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.