Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30793074›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2019

Dissociating tinnitus patients from healthy controls using resting-state cyclicity analysis and clustering.

Benjamin J Zimmerman, Ivan Abraham, Sara A Schmidt, Yuliy Baryshnikov, Fatima T Husain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hemodynamic cortical ripples through cyclicity analysis.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ultra-High Frequency Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions for Detection of Hearing Loss and Tinnitus.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Exposing Pathological Sensory Predictions in Tinnitus Using Auditory Intensity Deviant Evoked Responses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin J ZimmermanBeckman Institute for Advanced Science & Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2570-8198
Ivan AbrahamDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Sara A SchmidtBeckman Institute for Advanced Science & Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0161-8350
Yuliy BaryshnikovDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Fatima T HusainBeckman Institute for Advanced Science & Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5878-3851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic tinnitus is a common and sometimes debilitating condition that lacks scientific consensus on physiological models of how the condition arises as well as any known cure. In this study, we applied a novel cyclicity analysis, which studies patterns of leader-follower relationships between two signals, to resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data of brain regions acquired from subjects with and without tinnitus. Using the output from the cyclicity analysis, we were able to differentiate between these two groups with 58-67% accuracy by using a partial least squares discriminant analysis. Stability testing yielded a 70% classification accuracy for identifying individual subjects' data across sessions 1 week apart. Additional analysis revealed that the pairs of brain regions that contributed most to the dissociation between tinnitus and controls were those connected to the amygdala. In the controls, there were consistent temporal patterns across frontal, parietal, and limbic regions and amygdalar activity, whereas in tinnitus subjects, this pattern was much more variable. Our findings demonstrate a proof-of-principle for the use of cyclicity analysis of rs-fMRI data to better understand functional brain connectivity and to use it as a tool for the differentiation of patients and controls who may differ on specific traits.

Indexed as

ClassificationCyclicityResting-state fMRITinnitus

Identifiers

PMID30793074
PMCPMC6326732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.