ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2019
Cooperating yet distinct brain networks engaged during naturalistic paradigms: A meta-analysis of functional MRI results.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Sleep disorders and structural alterations in brain regions linked with motivation: a neuroimaging meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Neural systems underlying RDoC social constructs: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Meta-analytic clustering dissociates brain activity and behavior profiles across reward processing paradigms.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2020Pooled it
- Narrative coherence shapes functional connectivity in default mode and frontoparietal networks.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Learning via short videos impairs memory accuracy and reduces brain synchrony.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Multimodal correlates of socioemotional movie-watching and their associations with internalizing symptoms in childhood and adulthood.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neural similarity predicts whether strangers become friends.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Emotions in the Brain Are Dynamic and Contextually Dependent: Using Music to Measure Affective Transitions.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Touch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learning.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Article
- A function-based mapping of sensory integration along the cortical hierarchy.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Assessing the consistency and sensitivity of the neural correlates of narrative stimuli using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Inattentive and hyperactive traits differentially associate with interindividual functional synchrony during video viewing in young children without ADHD.Cerebral cortex communications · 2022Article
- The origins of evil: From lesions to the functional architecture of the antisocial brain.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- A tale of two connectivities: intra- and inter-subject functional connectivity jointly enable better prediction of social abilities.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- The cue-reactivity paradigm: An ensemble of networks driving attention and cognition when viewing drug and natural reward-related stimuli.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Individualized video recommendation modulates functional connectivity between large scale networks.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Brain-environment alignment during movie watching predicts fluid intelligence and affective function in adulthood.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Functional connectivity patterns predict naturalistic viewing versus rest across development.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Measurement reliability for individual differences in multilayer network dynamics: Cautions and considerations.NeuroImage · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive processes do not occur by pure insertion and instead depend on the full complement of co-occurring mental processes, including perceptual and motor functions. As such, there is limited ecological validity to human neuroimaging experiments that use highly controlled tasks to isolate mental processes of interest. However, a growing literature shows how dynamic, interactive tasks have allowed researchers to study cognition as it more naturally occurs. Collective analysis across such neuroimaging experiments may answer broader questions regarding how naturalistic cognition is biologically distributed throughout the brain. We applied an unbiased, data-driven, meta-analytic approach that uses
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.