Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30793053›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

Analysis of organizational power networks through a holistic approach using consensus strategies.

Valentina Ramos, Antonio Franco-Crespo, Lien González-Pérez, Yasel Guerra, Carlos Ramos-Galarza, Pablo Pazmiño, Eduardo Tejera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valentina RamosSistemas de Información, Gestión de la Tecnología e Innovación (SIGTI-Research Group), Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ecuador.
Antonio Franco-CrespoSistemas de Información, Gestión de la Tecnología e Innovación (SIGTI-Research Group), Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ecuador.
Lien González-PérezSistemas de Información, Gestión de la Tecnología e Innovación (SIGTI-Research Group), Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ecuador.
Yasel GuerraSistemas de Información, Gestión de la Tecnología e Innovación (SIGTI-Research Group), Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Ecuador.
Carlos Ramos-GalarzaPontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Universidad Indoamérica, Ecuador.
Pablo PazmiñoStrategy & Management Consultancy, Ecuador.
Eduardo TejeraUniversidad de las Américas, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Power is one of the most complex organizational attributes to understand due to the multiple related variables and dimensions in which it appears. The ownership and use and of power are reflected in the interpersonal relationships within an organization, as a result, modeling its structure and interactions can lead to knowledge about the power networks that shape it. The objective of this study was to identify the behavior of organizational networks based on existing sources of power, using a consensual analysis of the different topologies present in these networks. The study was carried out in a private production company in Ecuador, which has representation at a domestic level. To this end, a 12-question personalized questionnaire was designed with the aim of identifying specific networks and was applied to 1190 workers in the company. The results were obtained using organizational network analysis and a consensus strategy to integrate the centralities found in multiple networks into one. This study can serve as a reference to organizations, so they can know the relationships between people within it, as part of their management process. In this way, the identification of people within power networks is useful for knowing the "key" actors in the promotion of organizational changes, as well as for the development of career plans based on the position that people occupy in the organizational system.

Indexed as

BusinessPsychologySociology

Identifiers

PMID30793053
PMCPMC6370583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.