Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30792947›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2019

Evaluating a childhood obesity program with the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

Mei Sien Lew, Dagmar L'Allemand, Damian Meli, Peter Frey, Micheline Maire, Bettina Isenschmid, Kali Tal, Beatrice Molinari, Reto Auer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mei Sien LewInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dagmar L'AllemandPädiatrische Endokrinologie/Diabetologie, Fachbereich Jugendmedizin, Ostschweizer Kinderspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Damian MeliPrivate practice, Huttwil, Switzerland.
Peter FreyInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Micheline MaireInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Bettina IsenschmidKompetenzzentrum für Essverhalten, Adipositas und Psyche, Spital Zofingen, Switzerland.
Kali TalInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Beatrice MolinariInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Reto AuerInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHOstschweizer Kinderspital · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary care providers can use behavioral lifestyle interventions to effectively treat children with overweight and obesity, but implementing these interventions is challenging. Most childhood obesity intervention evaluation studies focus on effectiveness. Few studies describe implementation. Our goal was to evaluate critical components of a childhood obesity intervention in primary care. We conducted a pilot implementation study of an existing structured lifestyle intervention in the Canton of Bern, Switzerland from 2013 to 2015. The intervention consisted of 10 sessions, led by a primary care physician. It included children aged 6-8 years old, with BMI over the 90th age-adjusted percentile. We used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) evaluation framework to describe the pilot implementation study. We stratified description of RE-AIM components at the patient- and physician-level. For Reach: 864 children were screened; 65 were overweight; 394 physicians were invited to participate in the study. For Effectiveness: BMI z-score significantly decreased (-5.6%, p = 0.01). For Adoption: 14 participating physicians treated 26 patients. Implementation: the mean number of consultations was 8. For Maintenance: 9 (35%) children discontinued the intervention; 7 (50%) of physicians continued to apply at least one component of the intervention. The summarized components of the program within the RE-AIM framework suggest the program was successful. Stakeholders can use our results if they intend to disseminate and evaluate similar interventions in different settings.

Indexed as

Childhood obesityInterventionPrimary careRE-AIM

Identifiers

PMID30792947
PMCPMC6369326
OpenAlexW2912728614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.