Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30792879›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Evaluating healthcare practitioners' views on store-and-forward teledermoscopy services for the diagnosis of skin cancer.

Monika Janda, Caitlin Horsham, Uyen Koh, Nicole Gillespie, Dimitrios Vagenas, Lois J Loescher, Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski, Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof, H Peter Soyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monika JandaCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-8085
Caitlin HorshamCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0354-3583
Uyen KohSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nicole GillespieUQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Dimitrios VagenasSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Institute for Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Lois J LoescherColleges of Nursing and Public Health, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Clara Curiel-LewandrowskiCancer Centre, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Rainer Hofmann-WellenhofMedical University of Graz, Austria.
H Peter SoyerDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study is to evaluate healthcare practitioners' views on and satisfaction with (i) digital image acquisition and storage and (ii) store-and-forward teledermoscopy services for the diagnosis of skin cancer in their clinical practice.

methodsAn online survey was conducted among 59 healthcare practitioners (GPs (

resultsThirty-four healthcare practitioners (58%) had previously used a mobile dermatoscope within their practice. Participants most appreciated its use in their practice for lesion monitoring (59%) and record keeping (39%). Challenges reported were the increased time to support the additional workload (45%), technical issues (33%) and cost of equipment (27%). Practitioners were unsure (36%) or did not advocate teledermoscopy for direct-to-consumer use (41%). Only 23% supported the use of direct-to-consumer teledermoscopy.

conclusionWhile most practitioners are receptive to mobile teledermoscopy, there was less support for patient-initiated use, whereby the patient controls the imaging process. As technology improves rapidly it is important to evaluate practitioners' acceptance and satisfaction of evolving telehealth services, moving forward with models of practice where healthcare practitioners and other healthcare providers will feel comfortable engaging in telehealth services.

Indexed as

Service providersskin cancertechnology acceptanceteledermatologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30792879
PMCPMC6376520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.