Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30792760›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2019

Analysis of a new best-practice advisory on time to initiation of antibiotics in surgical intensive care unit patients with septic shock.

Tyler Chanas, David Volles, Rob Sawyer, Stephanie Mallow-Corbett

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating a Sepsis Screening Tool in the Outpatient Setting.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Pharmacist Involvement in Sepsis Response and Time to Antibiotics: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tyler ChanasUniversity of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2326-4629
David VollesUniversity of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Rob SawyerUniversity of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Stephanie Mallow-CorbettUniversity of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
University of Virginia Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly administration of antibiotics in septic shock is associated with decreased mortality. Promptly identifying sepsis and eliciting a response are necessary to reduce time to antibiotic administration.

methodsA best-practice advisory was introduced in the surgical intensive care unit to identify patients with septic shock and promote timely action. The best-practice advisory is triggered by blood culture orders and vasopressor administration within 24 h. The nurse or provider who triggers the alert may send an automatic notification to the intensive care unit resident, clinical pharmacist, and charge nurse, prompting bedside response and closer evaluation. Patients who met best-practice advisory criteria in the surgical intensive care unit from May 2016 through March 2017 were included. Outcomes included changes in antibiotics within 24 h, response to best-practice advisory, and time-to-antibiotics. Time-to-antibiotics was compared between a retrospective pre-intervention period and a six-month prospective post-intervention period defined by launch of the new best-practice advisory in September 2016. Data were analyzed by chi square, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis.

resultsDuring the first six months of best-practice advisory implementation, 191 alerts were triggered by 97 unique patients. Alert notification was transmitted in 79 best-practice advisories (41%), with pharmacist bedside response in 53 (67%). New antibiotics were started within 24 h following 83 best-practice advisories (43%). There was a trend toward decreased time-to-antibiotics following implementation of the best-practice advisory (7.4 vs. 4.2 h,

conclusionsA new best-practice advisory has been effective at eliciting a rapid response and reducing the time-to-antibiotics in surgical intensive care unit patients with septic shock. Team notification and pharmacist response are associated with decreased time-to-antibiotics.

Indexed as

antibioticselectronic alertintensive care unitSepsisseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID30792760
PMCPMC6376576
OpenAlexW2794644294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.