Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30792636›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2019

Everything Matters: The ReproNim Perspective on Reproducible Neuroimaging.

David N Kennedy, Sanu A Abraham, Julianna F Bates, Albert Crowley, Satrajit Ghosh, Tom Gillespie, Mathias Goncalves, Jeffrey S Grethe, Yaroslav O Halchenko, Michael Hanke and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current best practices and future opportunities for reproducible findings using large-scale neuroimaging in psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reproducing FSL's fMRI data analysisFrontiers in neuroimaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

David N KennedyEunice Kennedy Shriver Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Sanu A AbrahamMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Julianna F BatesEunice Kennedy Shriver Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Albert CrowleyTCG, Inc., Washington, DC, United States.
Satrajit GhoshMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Tom GillespieDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Mathias GoncalvesMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jeffrey S GretheDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Yaroslav O HalchenkoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Dartmouth, NH, United States.
Michael HankeInstitute of Psychology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christian HaselgroveEunice Kennedy Shriver Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Steven M HodgeEunice Kennedy Shriver Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Dorota JareckaMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jakub KaczmarzykMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
David B KeatorDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Kyle MeyerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Dartmouth, NH, United States.
Maryann E MartoneDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Smruti PadhyMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Jean-Baptiste PolineDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nina PreussTCG, Inc., Washington, DC, United States.
Troy SincombDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Matt TraversTCG, Inc., Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI David Nelson Kennedy · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
Neurosciences Graduate Training ProgramT32NS061847 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Brenda L Bloodgood · 2008 to 2026
$7.7M
Exposing the Deep Content of the Publication: Knowledge Extraction for Neuroimaging in Child PsychiatryR01MH083320 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FRAZIER, JEAN A, KENNEDY, DAVID NELSON · 2009 to 2020
$6.3M
Nipype: Dataflows for Reproducible Biomedical ResearchR01EB020740 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GHOSH, SATRAJIT SUJIT · 2016 to 2019
$2.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020740NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083320NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS061847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a recent major upsurge in the concerns about reproducibility in many areas of science. Within the neuroimaging domain, one approach is to promote reproducibility is to target the re-executability of the publication. The information supporting such re-executability can enable the detailed examination of how an initial finding generalizes across changes in the processing approach, and sampled population, in a controlled scientific fashion. ReproNim: A Center for Reproducible Neuroimaging Computation is a recently funded initiative that seeks to facilitate the "last mile" implementations of core re-executability tools in order to reduce the accessibility barrier and increase adoption of standards and best practices at the neuroimaging research laboratory level. In this report, we summarize the overall approach and tools we have developed in this domain.

Indexed as

data modelneuroimagingpublicationre-executabilityreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID30792636
PMCPMC6374302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.